Replies |
| |
Authors: | Martha Nussbaum |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Philosophy Department and Law School, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA |
| |
Abstract: | John Fischer challenges me to defend my arguments regarding the badness of death; I sharpen my position, but make some concessions, discussing the possibility of postmortem harm. In response to John Deigh, I defend the account of disgust given in Hiding from Humanity, together with the research of Paul Rozin that I follow there. I discuss Patrick Devlin’s conservative position, agree that we need to object to its emphasis on solidarity, not only to its emphasis on disgust, and argue that Deigh’s statement of Devlin’s position is too kind to Devlin. In response to Henry Richardson, I summarize my reasons for thinking that the classical social contract tradition cannot handle well the problems posed by the issue of justice for people with disabilities, and that even Rawls’s position requires major modification if it is to do so. I explore differences between Richardson’s position and my own on the issues of self-respect, liberty, and primary goods. |
| |
Keywords: | capabilities conservatism John Deigh Patrick Devlin disabilities disgust fear of death John Martin Fischer David Kass liberalism primary goods John Rawls Henry Richardson shame shaming punishments social contract social justice |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|