首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Replies
Authors:Martha Nussbaum
Affiliation:(1) Philosophy Department and Law School, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Abstract:John Fischer challenges me to defend my arguments regarding the badness of death; I sharpen my position, but make some concessions, discussing the possibility of postmortem harm. In response to John Deigh, I defend the account of disgust given in Hiding from Humanity, together with the research of Paul Rozin that I follow there. I discuss Patrick Devlin’s conservative position, agree that we need to object to its emphasis on solidarity, not only to its emphasis on disgust, and argue that Deigh’s statement of Devlin’s position is too kind to Devlin. In response to Henry Richardson, I summarize my reasons for thinking that the classical social contract tradition cannot handle well the problems posed by the issue of justice for people with disabilities, and that even Rawls’s position requires major modification if it is to do so. I explore differences between Richardson’s position and my own on the issues of self-respect, liberty, and primary goods.
Keywords:capabilities  conservatism  John Deigh  Patrick Devlin  disabilities  disgust  fear of death  John Martin Fischer  David Kass  liberalism  primary goods  John Rawls  Henry Richardson  shame  shaming punishments  social contract  social justice
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号