首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Proposal of a common terminology for the neuropsychological rehabilitation
Authors:Joana O Pinto  Bruno Peixoto  Artemisa R Dores  Fernando Barbosa
Institution:1. Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal;2. CESPU, University Institute of Health Sciences, Gandra, Portugal

NeuroGen - Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal

TOXRUN – Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences, CESPU, Gandra, Portugal

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Methodology (supporting), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);3. Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

ESS, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Center for Rehabilitation Research, ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Methodology (supporting), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);4. Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Methodology (supporting), Supervision (lead), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Abstract:The literature on neuropsychological intervention (NI) uses a variety of terms to refer to equivalent constructs, making it difficult to compare intervention programmes and their outcomes. The purpose of this work is to propose a unified terminological framework for describing NI programmes. The terminological framework was developed based on a previous proposal for common terminology by Johnstone and Stonnington (Rehabilitation of neuropsychological disorders: A practical guide for rehabilitation professionals. Psychology Press, 2011) and driven by Cognitive Psychology concepts. The terminological framework was organized into two sections: (a) NI, which includes types of NI, methods and approaches, instructional methods, and strategies; and (b) neurocognitive functions, which include temporal and spatial orientation, sensation, perception, visuo-constructional abilities, attention, memory, language, reasoning of several sorts (e.g., abstract reasoning, and numerical reasoning), and executive functions. Most NI tasks target a main neurocognitive function, but there are underlying neurocognitive functions that may impair performance in the former. Since it is difficult to create a task that is solely focused on one neurocognitive function, the proposed terminology should not be viewed as a taxonomy, but rather as dimensional, with the same task allowing to work different functions, in varying grades. Adopting this terminological framework will allow to define the targeted neurocognitive functions more accurately and simplify the comparison between NI programmes and their outcomes. Future research should focus on describing the main techniques/strategies for each neurocognitive function and non-cognitive interventions.
Keywords:neurocognitive enhancement  neurocognitive functions  neurocognitive rehabilitation  neurocognitive stimulation  neurocognitive training  neuropsychological rehabilitation  terminology
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号