首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Designs for evaluating the validity and accuracy of performance ratings
Institution:1. University of Bern, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland;2. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Department of Health Professions, Murtenstrasse 10, 3008 Bern, Switzerland;3. Federico II University of Naples Medical School, Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
Abstract:For many jobs, objective measures of performance are not available or are impractical to obtain, such that ratings are the sole source of information. Unfortunately, performance ratings are a distorted source of information. The multitrait-multimethod and person perception designs have been used to investigate the distortions in ratings. The purpose of using these research designs is to isolate the factors that distort the ratings and to use this knowledge to improve the quality of performance ratings. The goal of the present research was to develop a design that combined both the multitrait-multimethod and person perception designs. Each design was discussed, and examples were presented to illustrate that design. The combination design was used to isolate the influence of rater, ratee, and context factors on the quality of performance ratings. Future research was recommended to understand and utilize these factors to improve performance ratings.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号