Religion,ethnicity, coping style,and self-reported self-harm in a diverse non-clinical UK population |
| |
Authors: | Jo Borrill Pauline Fox Derek Roger |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology , University of Westminster , 309 Regent Street, London, W1B 2UW, UK j.borrill@wmin.ac.uk;3. School of Human and Psychological Sciences , Thames Valley University , Paragon House, Boston Manor Road, Brentford, TW8 9JA, UK;4. Department of Psychology , University of Canterbury , Christchurch, New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | Previous studies of ethnic and cultural differences in self-harm have focussed on overdose and suicide attempts by South Asian women. Research comparing ethnic groups has rarely examined religion or nationality. To achieve a more balanced approach this study examined self-harm methods and self-injury across gender, religion and ethnic group in a non-clinical population. Six hundred and seventeen university students completed a questionnaire asking whether they had ever harmed themselves, and the frequency and method of any self-harm. White participants and participants with no religious affiliation were more likely to report repeated incidents of self-harm, mainly scratching and cutting skin. Hindu religion was associated with lower levels of repeated self-harm. Asian males were less likely to report self-harm than both Asian females and other males. Black students were less likely to report cutting and scored highest on Rational coping style. The results raise questions about differential disclosure of self-harm across gender and culture. |
| |
Keywords: | religion ethnicity self-harm self-injury gender culture coping |
|
|