首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

关于两种Angoff法比较的模拟实验研究
引用本文:汪存友,余嘉元. 关于两种Angoff法比较的模拟实验研究[J]. 心理科学, 2010, 0(1)
作者姓名:汪存友  余嘉元
作者单位:南京师范大学心理系;
摘    要:采用模拟实验法比较研究了两种Angoff法——概率法和对错法——设定分数线的准确性和稳定性,结果表明:(1)当真能力低于测验的平均难度时,概率法高估分数线,而对错法低估分数线;反之,当真能力高于测验平均难度时,概率法低估,而对错法高估;(2)当真能力接近测验平均难度时,概率法比对错法更准确;反之,当真能力远高于或低于测验平均难度时,对错法更准确;(3)无论在何种实验条件下,概率法均比对错法更稳定。

关 键 词:Angoff法  标准设定  模拟研究  分数线  

A Simulation Experimental Study on the Comparison of Two Angoff Methods
Wang Cunyou,Yu Jiayuan. A Simulation Experimental Study on the Comparison of Two Angoff Methods[J]. Psychological Science, 2010, 0(1)
Authors:Wang Cunyou  Yu Jiayuan
Affiliation:Wang Cunyou,Yu Jiayuan (Department of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing,210097)
Abstract:In order to compare both the accuracy and stability of two Angoff methods:probability method and yes/no method,a simulation research was conducted.The research found that 1.When the true ability was less than the average test difficulty,the probability method would overestimate the passing score,while yes/no method would underestimate it;and when the true ability was greater than the average test difficulty,the probability method would underestimate the passing score,while the yes/no method would overestima...
Keywords:Angoff method  standard setting  simulation research  passing score  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号