A meta-analysis of bibliotherapy studies

Used meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of bibliotherapy. Bibliotherapy treatments were compared to control groups and therapist-administered treatments. The mean estimated effect size (d) of the 70 samples analyzed was +0.565. There was no significant differences between the effects of bibliotherapy and therapist-administered treatments, as well as no significant erosion of effect sizes at follow-up. Bibliotherapy did appear more effective for certain problem types (assertion training, anxiety, and sexual dysfunction) than for others (weight loss, impulse control, and studying problems). Overall, the amount of therapist contact during bibliotherapy did not seem to relate to effectiveness, but there was evidence that certain problem types (weight loss and anxiety reduction) responded better with increased therapist contact. Recommendations for future research were given, especially for more research on the commonly purchased books and moderator analyses by personality type and reading ability. This article is based on a doctoral dissertation by Rick W. Marrs under the direction of Steven D. Brown at Loyola University of Chicago. I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Brown as well as of my other committee members, Joseph Durlak and Gloria Lewis. I also gratefully acknowledge the assistance in coding done by Laura Marrs and John Gibson and helpful editorial comments made by Wayne Lucht.