Oversimplifying evolutionary psychology leads to explanatory gaps |
| |
Authors: | Tate Chuck Ledbetter Jay N |
| |
Affiliation: | San Francisco State University, CA 94132, USA. ctate2@sfsu.edu |
| |
Abstract: | Comments on Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations (see record 2010-02208-001) by Confer et al. They argued that SST cannot explain the existence of either homosexuality or suicide within the human species. We contend that a sufficiently nuanced evolutionary position has no difficulties explaining either phenomenon. Also in this account, it is assumed that all psychological functioning must serve survival and reproduction. However, since evolution selects against certain qualities (it does not select for qualities, as it is commonly, but incorrectly, described), two types of qualities should remain intact for any species: (a) those that facilitate survival and reproduction and (b) those that do not impede survival and reproduction at the population level. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|