首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

彼彻姆和查瑞斯的原则主义进路及其改进
引用本文:肖健,严金海,吕群蓉. 彼彻姆和查瑞斯的原则主义进路及其改进[J]. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版), 2008, 29(11)
作者姓名:肖健  严金海  吕群蓉
作者单位:南方医科大学人文学院,广东广州510515
基金项目:广东省普通高校人文社会科学“十一五”规划研究项目重点课题“医务人员行医行为规范体系研究”,项目编号:06ZD72001
摘    要:在全球化、多元化背景下,彼彻姆和查瑞斯通过寻找普世原则来容纳道德多元主义和避免道德相对主义,进而为医学伦理学提供一系列清晰、明确、有效的道德规范的努力无疑是可贵的,但其原则主义存在的突出问题是反思平衡方法在实践中不能有效解决根本性的道德冲突。针对这一不足,我们尝试提出解决道德冲突的更有希望的思路。

关 键 词:医学伦理学  原则主义  冲突  对话

Beauchamp and Childress' Principlism Approach and Its Improvement
XIAO Jian,YAN Jin-hai,LV Qun-rong.Humanities School of Southern Medical University,Guangzhou ,China. Beauchamp and Childress' Principlism Approach and Its Improvement[J]. Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition, 2008, 29(11)
Authors:XIAO Jian  YAN Jin-hai  LV Qun-rong.Humanities School of Southern Medical University  Guangzhou   China
Affiliation:XIAO Jian,YAN Jin-hai,LV Qun-rong.Humanities School of Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China
Abstract:In the background of globalization and pluralism,the effort which Beauchamp and Childress have made to seek for some general principles in order to avoid moral relativism and to accommodate moral pluralism,and provide a series of clear,explicit and effective moral norms for medical ethics,is no doubt valuable.A prominent problem with Beauchamp and Childress' principlism is that the method of reflective equilibrium often fails to solve basic moral conflicts successfully in practice.Aiming at this deficiency,...
Keywords:medical ethics  priciplism  conflict  dialogue  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号