首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


De-Ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Epistemic Interests
Authors:Jeroen Van Bouwel  Erik Weber
Affiliation:(1) Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Abstract:In a recent paper on realism and pragmatism published in this journal, Osmo Kivinen and Tero Piiroinen have been pleading for more methodological work in the philosophy of the social sciences—refining the conceptual tools of social scientists—and less philosophically ontological theories. Following this de-ontologizing approach, we scrutinize the debates on social explanation and contribute to the development of a pragmatic social science methodology. Analyzing four classic debates concerning explanation in the social sciences, we propose to shift the debate away from (a) the ontologizing defenses of forms of social explanation, and (b) a winner-takes-all-approach. Instead, we advocate (c) a pragmatic approach towards social explanation, elaborating a rigorous framework for explanatory pluralism detached from the debates on social ontology.
Contact Information Erik WeberEmail:
Keywords:Methodology of the social sciences  Ontology  Pluralism  Pragmatism  Social explanation
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号