PRESENTISM,TRUTH AND SUPERVENIENCE |
| |
| Authors: | Sam Baron |
| |
| Institution: | School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia., samuel.baron@sydney.edu.au |
| |
| Abstract: | Truthmaker theory is commonly thought to pose a challenge for presentism. Presentism seems to lack the ontological and ideological resources required to adequately underwrite the truth of propositions concerning the past. That is because if presentism is true, then the past does not exist. According to the standard response to this challenge, the truth of propositions concerning the past supervenes on surrogate entities that ‘stand proxy’ for past things. I argue that in order for the standard response to the truthmaker challenge to succeed these surrogate entities must stand in necessary connections to the past. I go on to argue that because the standard response is already committed to denying the existence of cross‐temporal modal connections of this kind, by its own lights that response is in error. 1 |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
