The Nature-Nurture Debate Is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity |
| |
Authors: | Matt Bradshaw Christopher G. Ellison |
| |
Affiliation: | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; University of Texas at Austin |
| |
Abstract: | In the debate about biological dispositions or differential sex-role socialization, too much emphasis is given to an either- or dichotomy. We argue that the higher religiosity of women is likely the product of both biological and environmental influences by discussing: (1) the fallacy of nature "versus" nurture; (2) biological influences on religious outcomes; (3) biological influences on the predictors of religious involvement; (4) causality and confounding in social science; and (5) interdisciplinary models of biology-environment interplay. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|