Clinical Decision-Making Following Disasters: Efficient Identification of PTSD Risk in Adolescents |
| |
Authors: | Carla Kmett Danielson Joseph R. Cohen Zachary W. Adams Eric A. Youngstrom Kathryn Soltis Ananda B. Amstadter Kenneth J. Ruggiero |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences,Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston,USA;2.Department of Psychology,University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign,Champaign,USA;3.Department of Psychology,University of North Carolina,Chapel Hill,USA;4.Department of Psychology,University of Memphis,Memphis,USA;5.Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics,Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,USA;6.Technology Applications Center for Healthful Lifestyles, College of Nursing,Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston,USA;7.Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center,Charleston,USA |
| |
Abstract: | The present study aimed to utilize a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) approach in order to improve clinical decision-making for adolescents at risk for the development of psychopathology in the aftermath of a natural disaster. Specifically we assessed theoretically-driven individual, interpersonal, and event-related vulnerability factors to determine which indices were most accurate in forecasting PTSD. Furthermore, we aimed to translate these etiological findings by identifying clinical cut-off recommendations for relevant vulnerability factors. Our study consisted of structured phone-based clinical interviews with 2000 adolescent-parent dyads living within a 5-mile radius of tornados that devastated Joplin, MO, and northern Alabama in Spring 2011. Demographics, tornado incident characteristics, prior trauma, mental health, and family support and conflict were assessed. A subset of youth completed two behavioral assessment tasks online to assess distress tolerance and risk-taking behavior. ROC analyses indicated four variables that significantly improved PTSD diagnostic efficiency: Lifetime depression (AUC = .90), trauma history (AUC = .76), social support (AUC = .70), and family conflict (AUC = .72). Youth were 2–3 times more likely to have PTSD if they had elevated scores on any of these variables. Of note, event-related characteristics (e.g., property damage) were not related to PTSD diagnostic status. The present study adds to the literature by making specific recommendations for empirically-based, efficient disaster-related PTSD assessment for adolescents following a natural disaster. Implications for practice and future trauma-related developmental psychopathology research are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|