首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordóñez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions
引用本文:Zeelenberg M,van Dijk WW ,Manstead AS. Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordóñez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2000, 81(1): 143-154. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2865
作者姓名:Zeelenberg M  van Dijk WW   Manstead AS
摘    要:

收稿时间:1999-07-27

Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordóñez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions
Zeelenberg ,van Dijk WW ,Manstead. Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordóñez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2000, 81(1): 143-154. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2865
Authors:Zeelenberg   van Dijk WW   Manstead
Affiliation:Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Abstract:T. Connolly, L. D. Ordo;aan;atez, and R. Coughlan (1997, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 73–85) argued, on the basis of 5 experiments, that regret need not be related to a sense of responsibility for the regretted outcome. We (M. Zeelenberg, W. W. van Dijk, &; A. S. R. Manstead, 1998, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254–272) showed in 2 experiments that this conclusion was premature, because it was based on an indirect measure of regret (i.e., overall happiness with the decision outcome). When regret was directly measured, the predicted effects of responsibility were found. L. D. Ordo;aan;atez and T. Connolly (2000, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 132–142) replicated our findings in 2 experiments. Based on their findings they arrived at 4 conclusions. In this rejoinder we first discuss Ordóñez and Connolly's new studies and we then discuss the validity of their 4 conclusions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号