论翻译的技巧、理想、标准及其形成过程--兼析作为《论不可译性》之理论前提的康德先验哲学观

怎样才能提升翻译研究的理论水平?进行翻译理论研究是不是必须诉诸康德的先验哲学框架?本文认为，作为王宾教授所谓“不可译性”之理论前提的康德哲学“经验VS先验”的基本观点，其实并不适合于进行翻译理论研究；实际上，这里的根本问题是“翻译的实际经验性行为”与“翻译标准”之间的关系。只有从我自己构建并逐渐完善的社会个体生成论的角度出发，把翻译研究所涉及的历时性维度与共时性维度有机结合起来，正确处理翻译技巧、翻译理想和翻译标准之间的关系，我们才能正确地认识“翻译标准”及其形成过程，从而使之发挥适当的作用，达到逐步提高翻译理论研究水平的目的。

On the Translational Artistry,Ideal,Criteria and Their Courses of Growing - up

How can we improve our levels of translation research? Is it necessary to resort to Kant's frame of transcendental philosophy when we study translation theory? This essay stresses that this frame of transcendental philosophy, which is the theoretical presupposition of Prof. Wang Bin's paper "On The Non-Translationability", is actually not fit for research of translation theory at all. In fact, the key point here is how to approach the relationship between "the actually experiential behavior of translation" and "the criteria of translation". It emphasizes that only by going from the theory of social individual's growing-up, which is constructed by this essay's author himself, integrating organically the diachronical dimension with synchronical dimension related to the studies of translation, and so dealing with the relationships among translation artistry, translation ideal, and translation criteria appropriately, can we recognize the criteria of translation and their courses of growing-up properly, and so do enhance our levels of translation studies gradually through locating the role of these criteria of translation rightly.