Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity |
| |
Authors: | Brenda Major Wendy J Quinton Toni Schmader |
| |
Institution: | a Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA b Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This study examined group identification and situational ambiguity as moderators of attributions to discrimination and self-esteem following negative feedback. As predicted, high gender-identified women made more discrimination attributions than low identified women when situational prejudice cues were ambiguous, but not when prejudice cues were absent or overt. Also as predicted, women exposed to overt prejudice cues had higher self-esteem than those exposed to ambiguous cues or no prejudice cues. The relationship between discrimination attributions and self-esteem was positive among women exposed to overt prejudice but negative among those exposed to no prejudice. Across conditions, however, the more that women discounted ability as a cause of their negative feedback (i.e., blamed discrimination more than ability), the higher their self-esteem. Results qualify and extend prior research and demonstrate that personal and situational factors moderate both the tendency to make attributions to discrimination and the consequences of those attributions for self-esteem. |
| |
Keywords: | Prejudice Discrimination Self-esteem Group identification Attributions Discounting |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|