首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness
Affiliation:1. Ford Research and Innovation Center, Süsterfeldstr. 200, D-52072 Aachen, Germany;2. Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands;3. TNO Perceptual and Cognitive Systems, Kampweg 5, 3769 DE Soesterberg, Netherlands;4. Royal College of Art, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre (IMDC), 4 Hester Road, SW11 4AN London United Kingdom
Abstract:About two in three people have experienced carsickness at some point in their life (Reason & Brand, 1975). Little is known about current numbers of sufferers, cultural differences, or which modulating factors are being perceived as most relevant. Therefore, given a global increase of interest in carsickness driven by the development of automated vehicles, this survey intended to assess the status quo of carsickness in different parts of the world. We conducted an online survey with N = 4,479 participants in Brazil, China, Germany, UK and USA. 46% of participants indicated they had experienced some degree of carsickness in the past five years as a passenger in a car. When including childhood experiences, this rate increased to 59%, comparable to the 1975 findings by Reason and Brand. The highest and lowest incidence of carsickness was reported in China and Germany, respectively. In all countries, men and older participants reported a lower incidence of carsickness as compared to females and younger participants. The main modulating factors were found to be driving dynamics, visual activities, and low air quality. This study showed that carsickness still affects about 2/3 of passengers and discusses how its occurrence relates to in-transit activities and other modes of transport. The research provides a sound basis to further study how carsickness develops and to investigate countermeasures to potentially reduce it.
Keywords:Motion sickness  Carsickness  Passenger comfort  Cultural differences  International survey
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号