Performance in normal subjects on a novel battery of driving-related sensory-motor and cognitive tests |
| |
Authors: | Carrie R. H. Innes Richard D. Jones Susan G. Hollobon John C. Dalrymple-Alford |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804 Munich, Germany;(2) Department Psychology, Neuropsychology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Currently, there is no international standard for the assessment of fitness to drive for cognitively or physically impaired persons. A computerized battery of driving-related sensory-motor and cognitive tests (SMCTests) has been developed, comprising tests of visuoperception, visuomotor ability, complex attention, visual search, decision making, impulse control, planning, and divided attention. Construct validity analysis was conducted in 60 normal, healthy subjects and showed that, overall, the novel cognitive tests assessed cognitive functions similar to a set of standard neuropsychological tests. The novel tests were found to have greater perceived face validity for predicting on-road driving ability than was found in the equivalent standard tests. Test—retest stability and reliability of SMCTests measures, as well as correlations between SMCTests and on-road driving, were determined in a subset of 12 subjects. The majority of test measures were stable and reliable across two sessions, and significant correlations were found between on-road driving scores and measures from ballistic movement, footbrake reaction, hand-control reaction, and complex attention. The substantial face validity, construct validity, stability, and reliability of SMCTests, together with the battery’s level of correlation with on-road driving in normal subjects, strengthen our confidence in the ability of SMCTests to detect and identify sensory-motor and cognitive deficits related to unsafe driving and increased risk of accidents. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|