What's parenting got to do with it: emotional autonomy and brain and behavioral responses to emotional conflict in children and adolescents |
| |
Authors: | Hilary A. Marusak Moriah E. Thomason Kelsey Sala‐Hamrick Laura Crespo Christine A. Rabinak |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA;2. Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA;3. Merill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA;4. Perinatology Research Branch, National Institutes of Health, Detroit, MI, USA;5. Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA;6. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA;7. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Healthy parenting may be protective against the development of emotional psychopathology, particularly for children reared in stressful environments. Little is known, however, about the brain and behavioral mechanisms underlying this association, particularly during childhood and adolescence, when emotional disorders frequently emerge. Here, we demonstrate that psychological control, a parenting strategy known to limit socioemotional development in children, is associated with altered brain and behavioral responses to emotional conflict in 27 at‐risk (urban, lower income) youth, ages 9–16. In particular, youth reporting higher parental psychological control demonstrated lower activity in the left anterior insula, a brain area involved in emotion conflict processing, and submitted faster but less accurate behavioral responses—possibly reflecting an avoidant pattern. Effects were not replicated for parental care, and did not generalize to an analogous nonemotional conflict task. We also find evidence that behavioral responses to emotional conflict bridge the previously reported link between parental overcontrol and anxiety in children. Effects of psychological control may reflect a parenting style that limits opportunities to practice self‐regulation when faced with emotionally charged situations. Results support the notion that parenting strategies that facilitate appropriate amounts of socioemotional competence and autonomy in children may be protective against social and emotional difficulties. |
| |
Keywords: | emotion processing
fMRI
parental bonding neuroimaging emotion regulation |
|
|