Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa;2. Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa;3. Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;4. Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA;5. Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University, Belfast, United Kingdom Mark Tomlinson and Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus contributed equally to this work.;6. Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California Mark Tomlinson and Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus contributed equally to this work. |
Abstract: | Despite empirical support for “Self-control theory” in criminology, there is controversy about how self-control should be operationalized. Working within the framework of “self-control theory,” we investigated if violence and criminal behaviors are associated with nine distinct dimensions of cognitive control in a community sample of young men (n = 654) living in peri-urban townships in South Africa. Cognitive control was assessed using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Multivariate statistical analysis was used, to identify associations between violence and criminality, and deaggregated measures of nine distinct components of cognitive control. Fifteen percent of the sample reported recent violence, 27% had been in physical fights with family/friends in the preceding 6 months, 10% reported being arrested, 4% reported forced sexual contact, and 26% reported intimate partner violence (IPV). Controlling for substance use and sociodemographic variables, contact with the criminal justice system and violence were associated with deficits in all domains of cognitive control. Forced sexual contact was associated with behavioral dysregulation. IPV was associated with behavior dysregulation and executive control dysfunction. Future studies might utilize deaggregated measures of self-control to provide further insight into links between particular components of cognitive control and various forms of offending and violence. |