Absolutely general knowledge* |
| |
Authors: | Rachel Elizabeth Fraser Beau Madison Mount |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Exeter College, Oxford University;2. New College, Oxford University |
| |
Abstract: | There is extensive debate among contemporary philosophers about the possibility of absolutely unrestricted quantification; thus far, the debate been almost entirely logically and metaphysically focused. We argue for a third axis of evaluation: the epistemological. We defend absolutism on epistemological grounds, by showing that one prominent and attractive alternative to absolutism—schematism—is epistemologically unacceptable. First, we spell out and motivate an epistemological desideratum for theories of generality, a desideratum which is easily satisfied by absolutists. Second, we consider five ways the schematist might satisfy this desideratum. We argue that none of the five ways is successful. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|