The persistent problem of targetless thought |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Texas Tech University, United States;2. Midland College, United States;1. Arizona State University, USA;2. Iowa State University, USA;1. University of Massachusetts, United States;2. National Science Foundation, United States;3. US Naval Research Laboratory, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Targetless thought raises a persistent problem for higher-order theories of consciousness. In cases of targetless thought, a subject represents herself as being in a mental state that she in fact lacks. One popular response among proponents of the higher-order theory is to say that it can appear to a subject that she is in a conscious mental state, even though that mental state doesn’t exist (Picciuto, 2017; Rosenthal 1997, 2011; Weisberg, 2010). Recently Brown and Lau (2019) and Lau and Rosenthal (2011) have shifted the debate to empirical ground, and offered evidence for real-world cases of targetless thought. In this paper, I give an alternate explanation of the evidence which avoids the need to posit targetless thoughts. As I argue, this challenges the empirical argument for the higher-order view because it shows that the evidence on offer does not discriminate between the first-order and higher-order theories of consciousness. |
| |
Keywords: | Higher-order thought Philosophy Consciousness |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|