| Abstract: | Processes that emerge in the course of group treatment, such as universality and mutual aid, have been posited to promote therapeutic change (e.g., Yalom, 1995); however, they have received relatively little attention in the group cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) literature (Rose, 2004). Group CBT interventions have been successful in alleviating symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders, such as major depression and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder (e.g., Anderson & Rees, 2007; Himle et al., 2001). A specialized group CBT protocol has been developed to treat hoarding (Muroff et al., 2009; Steketee & Frost, 2007), characterized by excessive clutter in the home, difficulty discarding objects that appear of little value, and often excessive acquisition, resulting in significant distress and/or impairment (Frost & Hartl, 1996). Individual (Tolin, Frost, & Steketee, 2007) and group (Muroff et al.) CBT for hoarding have shown promising effects. An examination of group process factors relevant to hoarding, however, is critical in order to further understand and tailor group interventions for this complex problem. The current paper characterizes four group processes specific to group CBT for hoarding: (a) universality or inclusion may reduce stigma and shame about having hoarding; (b) cohesion seems to support attendance and to provide positive peer pressure to motivate change; (c) the opportunity to give mutual aid seems to instill hope and motivate change; (d) social contact and socializing may reduce social isolation, a characteristic of this population. Discussion includes specific case examples illustrating these group processes and their potential complexity, within the context of group CBT for hoarding. Recommendations are advanced for future directions in evaluating group CBT for hoarding, particularly the formal study of group process variables with this population. |
