排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
2.
Metadialogues for Resolving Burden
of Proof Disputes 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Douglas N. Walton 《Argumentation》2007,21(3):291-316
In this paper, a solution to the problem of analyzing burden of proof in argumentation is developed by building on the pioneering
work of Erik C. W. Krabbe on metadialogues. Three classic cases of burden of proof disputes are analyzed, showing how metadialogue
theory can solve the problems they pose. The solution is based on five dialectical requirements: (1) global burden of proof
needs to be set at the confrontation stage of a dialogue, (2) there need to be special mechanisms for resolving disputes about
burden of proof at all four stages of the dialogue, (3) they are especially significant during the argumentation stage, where
burden of proof often shifts back and forth at each move, (4) such local shifts need to be partly regulated by the global
burden of proof already set, and (5) the connection between burden of proof and the speech act of making a presumption in
a dialogue needs to be clarified. 相似文献
3.
Lorenz Demey 《Metaphilosophy》2017,48(4):575-590
This article describes a specific pedagogical context for an advanced logic course and presents a strategy that might facilitate students’ transition from the object‐theoretical to the metatheoretical perspective on logic. The pedagogical context consists of philosophy students who in general have had little training in logic, except for a thorough introduction to syllogistics. The teaching strategy tries to exploit this knowledge of syllogistics, by emphasizing the analogies between ideas from metalogic and ideas from syllogistics, such as existential import, the distinction between contradictories and contraries, and the square of opposition. This strategy helps to improve students’ understanding of metalogic, because it allows the students to integrate these new ideas with their previously acquired knowledge of syllogistics. 相似文献
1