排序方式: 共有14条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Standard quantum mechanics unquestionably violates the separability principle that classical physics (be it point-like analytic,
statistical, or field-theoretic) accustomed us to consider as valid. In this paper, quantum nonseparability is viewed as a
consequence of the Hilbert-space quantum mechanical formalism, avoiding thus any direct recourse to the ramifications of Kochen-Specker’s
argument or Bell’s inequality. Depending on the mode of assignment of states to physical systems – unit state vectors versus
non-idempotent density operators – we distinguish between strong/relational and weak/deconstructional forms of quantum nonseparability.
The origin of the latter is traced down and discussed at length, whereas its relation to the all important concept of potentiality
in forming a coherent picture of the puzzling entangled interconnections among spatially separated systems is also considered.
Finally, certain philosophical consequences of quantum non-separability concerning the nature of quantum objects, the question
of realism in quantum mechanics, and possible limitations in revealing the actual character of physical reality in its entirety
are explored. 相似文献
2.
Michael Esfeld 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1999,30(1):17-36
The aim of this paper is to contribute to a more balanced judgement than the widespread impression that the changes which
are called for in today's philosophy of physics and which centre around the concept of holism amount to a rupture with the
framework of Cartesian philosophy of physics. I argue that this framework includes a sort of holism: As a result of the identification
of matter with space, any physical property can be instantiated only if there is the whole of matter. Relating this holism
to general relativity, I maintain that this holism cannot be directly applied to today's philosophy of physics consequent
upon the failure of geometrodynamics. I show in what respect precisely the holism in quantum physics amounts to a revision
of the holism within Cartesianism.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
3.
王忠华 《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》2014,(21)
干细胞生物学的研究目前还处于一个“灰箱”的状态,阻止机制阐明的最大障碍之一可能是因为缺少一个行之有效且又不会改变干细胞自然属性的研究平台。这个平台的中心是要有一个像“薛定谔的猫”那样能即时报告干细胞属性的作用角色。目前,主要有两方面阻碍了干细胞研究的进一步深化,一个是干细胞如何不对称分裂,另一个是干细胞巢的结构组成。其实,在微观世界的许多研究中,如物理学中的量子论,都是因为缺少那只“薛定谔的猫”才使研究的钟摆停在原地不动。 相似文献
4.
Kullervo Rainio 《World Futures: Journal of General Evolution》2013,69(4):270-303
Attempts to create a coherent scientific picture of the world as a whole on the basis of quantum physics has sped up at the turn of the millennium. There particularly seem to be expectations that the development of a new kind of quantum mechanics could make it possible to describe both matter and consciousness in one frame of reference (“dual aspect approach”). These ideas are often results of brilliant intuitive visions but as yet not able to produce testable hypotheses. Maybe “wave mechanics” is not very suitable in the study of consciousness from the quantum mechanical point of view. The aim of this article is to show how both the matter and the mind systems can be described with one coherent mathematical model if we assume both space and time to be discrete. 相似文献
5.
Martin Thomson-Jones 《Australasian journal of philosophy》2013,91(3):567-570
David Lewis is a natural target for those who believe that findings in quantum physics threaten the tenability of traditional metaphysical reductionism. Such philosophers point to allegedly holistic entities they take both to be the subjects of some claims of quantum mechanics and to be incompatible with Lewisian metaphysics. According to one popular argument, the non-separability argument from quantum entanglement, any realist interpretation of quantum theory is straightforwardly inconsistent with the reductive conviction that the complete physical state of the world supervenes on the intrinsic properties of and spatio-temporal relations between its point-sized constituents. Here I defend Lewis's metaphysical doctrine, and traditional reductionism more generally, against this alleged threat from quantum holism. After presenting the non-separability argument from entanglement, I show that Bohmian mechanics, an interpretation of quantum mechanics explicitly recognized as a realist one by proponents of the non-separability argument, plausibly rejects a key premise of that argument. Another holistic worry for Humeanism persists, however, the trouble being the apparently holistic character of the Bohmian pilot wave. I present a Humean strategy for addressing the holistic threat from the pilot wave by drawing on resources from the Humean best system account of laws. 相似文献
6.
Ernest L. Simmons 《Theology & Science》2013,11(2):137-150
The main thesis of this article is that the Trinitarian theological doctrine of perichoresis can be metaphorically interpreted as a form of Divine phase entanglement with the world. Such entanglement would entail non-local, relational holism and superposition through which the immanent unity of the Trinity is economically present in creation. Christ kenoticly empties himself of the immanent perichoresis of the Trinity in order to enter the economic perichoresis of the creation. The Spirit is then the continuing perichoretic love of God sanctifying the creation toward life and fulfillment from within. It is the Trinity in ongoing perichoretic entanglement with the creation, affirming Divine ubiquity and panentheism. 相似文献
7.
This paper sets out a moderate version of metaphysical structural realism that stands in contrast to both the epistemic structural
realism of Worrall and the—radical—ontic structural realism of French and Ladyman. According to moderate structural realism,
objects and relations (structure) are on the same ontological footing, with the objects being characterized only by the relations
in which they stand. We show how this position fares well as regards philosophical arguments, avoiding the objections against
the other two versions of structural realism. In particular, we set out how this position can be applied to space-time, providing
for a convincing understanding of space-time points in the standard tensor formulation of general relativity as well as in
the fibre bundle formulation. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
Mari E. Ramler 《Dialog》2023,62(1):95-103
To take incarnation seriously, Creation Care Christians, such as Douglas and Jonathan Moo, focus on Jesus’ divinity in incarnation. If the divine Jesus was fully flesh, then creation must be good. And if we do not take care of it, we are sinning, they reason. Laurel C. Schneider's promiscuous view of incarnation insists on a porous flesh, one that is materially entangled with the world. This is beyond Sallie McFague's model of the world as God's body. Applying Schneider's promiscuous incarnation, Mary-Jane Rubenstein claims that the world is God's body, and, as such, God does not transcend matter as Ernest Simmons suggests. For Catherine Keller, unknowable divine interdependence must move us to civic action. In the middle of this conversation, I offer the term wicked incarnations to make explicit the intra-action of divinity and the world in its incarnations. To take incarnation seriously is to acknowledge incarnations as a dynamism of divine and material forces, neither of which pre-exist their relationship. I join Keller in hoping that this moves us to care about and for the material world, its changing climate, and our intra-active relationship with nonhuman, divine presence. 相似文献