熊十力《新唯识论》的易学渊源与理论创新

研究《周易》生命哲学,单向度地从宇宙论演绎太极阴阳变化,或从心性论凸显易道生命实践的主体能动性,都无法实证宇宙大生命一体贯通的诚明合一之境。在熊十力哲学多元文化渊源和思想元素中,《周易》无疑是其哲学创新的最深邃的理论源泉和精神根基。宇宙本体与生命主体圆融为一,以生生之道涵化主体心灵,用主体心灵担当天地之情,成为熊十力《新唯识论》生命哲学理论突破的关键所在。     

王安石《易象论解》与《序卦传》

<易象论解>是王安石模仿<序卦传>形式所作的另类"新<序卦传>".在<易象论解>中,王安石独辟徯径,发掘<周易>的<大象>传文的内在逻辑联系,按六十四卦的编排顺序,诠释六十四卦卦时相因及相反的关系.不仅从新的角度论证了六十四卦编排顺序的合理性,并且完成了自己政治主张和政治理想的基本表述,在形式和内容上都具有鲜明的时代特色.由此弥补了<序卦传>过于简单的缺陷,丰富了<易传>系统的内容.     

牟宗三形著说质疑

本文依次从心体是否需要性体保证其客观性,性体能否保证心体的客观性,形著说能否达到预期目的,究竟应该如何看待天道等方面,向牟宗三著名的形著说提出质疑。本文总的结论是,形著说虽有重要的理论意义,但其路子从一开始就没有走对,不仅不能有效解决理论上的难题,而且有叠床架屋之嫌。     

Zhi and Neng belong to mind: a study of the capacity to be good in the mind of Xunzi

ABSTRACT

The mainstream of academia thinks that Xunzi’s theory of human nature, which claims that human nature is bad, is in contrast with those of Confucius and Mencius and is unable to provide a foundation for human moral subjectivity. However, there are more and more scholars bringing up different ideas, such as Lu Debin and Fung Yiuming. They think that Xunzi’s wei 偽 (artifice), which includes zhi知 (knowing) and neng 能 (capacity), is a kind of inborn capacity to think and activate that belongs to xing. This paper points out that zhi and neng belong to xin 心 (mind) rather than xing. In the text of Xunzi, xing is mainly regarded as human emotions and desires which would result in chaos if not controlled. Making zhi and neng belong to xing does not accord with Xunzi’s theory and will confuse people with the connotation of Xunzi’s xing.     

圣贤之后的人生追寻:冯友兰《新世训》的伦理学意义

Feng Youlan’s Xin Shixun 新世训 (New Treatise on the Way of Life) written in the late 1930s differed from traditional moral teachings because it focused on nonmoral life lessons and how to “virtuously” pursue success. It advanced an interpretation of traditional virtues as life lessons for young people, so that these virtues could transform an individual life in modern society. Thereby the morals of ancient sages could transfer to the modern, individual, and morality. The problem is just how the ideals of traditional Chinese culture have adjusted themselves to modern society. Following the phrase “after-virtue”, this effort can be called a pursuit of “after-sage”. Translated by Yan Xin from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 (Philosophical Researches), 2006, (2): 36–44     

晚清时期执权居士创制“心理(学)”一词的考察

据史料表明, 中国人执权居士于1872年在《申报》上首创了学科名称“心理(学)”一词, 这要早于日本学者西周1875年公开使用“心理学”一词。本文判定晚清的持平叟、执权居士、持平子、持平居士、公道老人均系同一人, 即朱逢甲。朱逢甲饱读经书, 国学底蕴深厚, 并在襄助传教士办报纸过程中接触到了西学, 具有了现代学科意识。1871年, 他在讨论中国传统相术时, 曾在心理学意义上使用过“心之理与事”一词, 为其创制“心理(学)”一词奠定了基础。中学与西学的交融与碰撞是朱逢甲创制“心理学”这一学科名称的时代与文化背景。尽管“心理(学)”一词首先由中国知识分子创制, 但因西学在中国晚清时期发展的延缓和曲折, 故没有像日本学者西周使用“心理学”一词之后在日本学界产生更为深远的影响。     

略述刘逢禄对《左传》的攻毁

在刘逢禄之前只有怀疑、否定《左传》的零星论点,还没有形成系统的思想,但这些论点是刘逢禄否定《左传》的先声。刘逢禄在经学史上首次提出了否定《左传》的系统思想:一是说明《左氏春秋》是与《晏子春秋》等类似的史书,从根本上消除《左传》与《春秋》的关联;二是指斥刘歆的作伪,攻击《春秋左传》是经刘歆作伪的产物。此论不免有牵强附会之说,但在清代经学史与后来的文化史上产生了巨大的影响。     

书院:明代心学建构与传播的主要依托

明代心学是批判程朱理学的产物。不但心学的建构是与书院密切关联的,而且面对官方的禁学,心学的代表人物及其门人纷纷创建、修复书院以传播心学,使心学成为明代的显学。为解决书院研究、传播心学与教授科举应试知识的矛盾,心学家主张将书院应试教育与传播心学结合起来,二者互为表里,使书院在研究、传播心学过程中发挥更大的作用。     

清源正本：解析晁错《论贵粟疏》对《管子》的接受与承袭

晁错是西汉初年著名的政治家、文学家,法家学派的代表人物之一。《论贵粟疏》是晁错在公元前168年向汉文帝上奏的一封书信,反映了他重农贵粟的政治主张。通过笺释解析发现,此文中的许多思想与观点均来自《管子》一书,体现了晁错对管子的接受与承袭,也可以看出法家学派的一脉相承以及管子在汉代产生的巨大影响。     

An Early Buddhist Text on Logic: Fang Bian Xin Lun

The Fang Bian Xin Lun is a text on Buddhist logic which is thought to be the earliest one still to be extant. It appears in Chinese only (T1632). The great Italian indologist Giuseppe Tucci, believing that the text was originally a Sanskrit text, translated it into Sanskrit and gave it the title Upāyahṛdaya. The paper provides the historical background of the development of logic in Classical India up to the time of this text, summarizes its content and translates its first section.