How Do Children Restrict Their Linguistic Generalizations? An (Un‐)Grammaticality Judgment Study

A paradox at the heart of language acquisition research is that, to achieve adult‐like competence, children must acquire the ability to generalize verbs into non‐attested structures, while avoiding utterances that are deemed ungrammatical by native speakers. For example, children must learn that, to denote the reversal of an action, un‐ can be added to many verbs, but not all (e.g., roll/unroll; close/*unclose). This study compared theoretical accounts of how this is done. Children aged 5–6 (N = 18), 9–10 (N = 18), and adults (N = 18) rated the acceptability of un‐ prefixed forms of 48 verbs (and, as a control, bare forms). Across verbs, a negative correlation was observed between the acceptability of ungrammatical un‐ prefixed forms (e.g., *unclose) and the frequency of (a) the bare form and (b) alternative forms (e.g., open), supporting the entrenchment and pre‐emption hypotheses, respectively. Independent ratings of the extent to which verbs instantiate the semantic properties characteristic of a hypothesized semantic cryptotype for un‐ prefixation were a significant positive predictor of acceptability, for all age groups. The relative importance of each factor differed for attested and unattested un‐ forms and also varied with age. The findings are interpreted in the context of a new hybrid account designed to incorporate the three factors of entrenchment, pre‐emption, and verb semantics.     

Working with Psychosis

This is the first of four papers about working with psychosis in a newly established post of psycho-analytic psychotherapist in an acute psychiatric unit in Australia. In this paper the author gives an account of some early impressions and experiences with staff and patients, particularly connected with an unacknowledged grief in the aftermath of psychosis. The author next discusses some of the psycho-analytic theory about psychosis which he found containing and helped make some sense of his experiences. He then introduces a case study of an exploratory psycho-analytic psychotherapy with a 40-year-old man suffering from a bi-polar disorder. The beginning of the therapy is described when this man revealed feelings of grief and despair about his illness. Being able to face and bear these feelings enabled him to begin to mourn what was irretrievably lost because of his illness and to contemplate what might still be possible. The author describes some of the early themes and one session in detail, and discusses how fluctuations in contact with the client reflect his retreat to a pathological organization in the mind. This psychic retreat was dominated by a psychotic process, and the retreat offered refuge from a dread of fragmentation and the pain of mourning and loss.     

The attraction of evil and the destruction of meaning

Does the concept of evil deserve special formulation in the realm of psychoanalytic thought? In agreement with authors such as Meltzer (1992) and De Masi (2003) and through selected moments from a boy's long analysis, I will propose a definition of evil as a state of mind, characterized by disregard for the human quality of the object and the destruction of meaning and meaningfulness of life in and for others. Evil drains, perverts and strips symbols of intentions and goals, leaving them empty of emotional significance. In my patient, the state of mind that he called evil exerted a seductive appeal and was accompanied by a sadistic excitement that he elevated into a state of sexualized well‐being, which progressively perverted and destroyed emotional meaning, contributing to his confusion and desperation. Confronting this pathological configuration and describing the situation that I felt existed within his mind and between us, and rearticulating emotional meaning where it had been perverted, cannibalized or left empty, was the principal – and at times only – clinical instrument available to lead him out of his descent into nothingness.