A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing

The current review focuses on recent event-related brain potential (ERPs) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in L2 syntactic processing data. To this end, critical factors influencing both the dynamics of neural mechanisms (ERPs) and critical functional brain correlates (fMRI) are discussed. These entail the critical period hypothesis, levels of proficiency, cross-linguistic syntactic similarities and dissimilarities as well as brain bases that may or may not be shared during syntactic processing in a first (L1) and a second (L2) language. The data to date reveal that (i) the critical period hypothesis plays less of a significant role than initially discussed, (ii) L2 proficiency is a driving factor influencing peak and extent of activation in brain correlates and in neurophysiological mechanisms as a function of learning, and (iii) language transfer effects (i.e., positive transfer effects when L1 and L2 are structurally similar or negative transfer effects when L1 and L2 are structurally dissimilar) primarily from the L1 to the L2 and potentially vice versa need to be critically considered in future research.     

经颅直流电刺激对健康人群反应抑制的影响

反应抑制是指抑制不恰当的或不符合当前需要的行为的能力, 研究表明反应抑制主要与额下回、背外侧前额叶和前辅助运动区的功能有关。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入式脑刺激技术, 近年来对健康人群使用tDCS刺激相应脑区从而影响反应抑制功能的研究日益增多, 但主要研究结果不一致。阐明tDCS影响反应抑制具体的神经机制、减少tDCS研究的异质性、探索更有效的tDCS刺激方式和确定tDCS效果的年龄依赖性差异已成为目前亟待解决的问题。     

额叶区域的经颅直流电刺激对抑制控制的影响

抑制控制是执行功能的重要组成部分之一, 研究表明抑制控制与额叶区域的活动有关。经颅直流电刺激(Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS)是一种非侵入性的脑刺激技术, 可以调节脑区的激活程度。研究表明tDCS刺激额叶的部分区域可以有效干预参与者的抑制控制水平, 而这一干预作用会受到刺激位置、刺激类型以及实验任务等条件变化的影响。目前tDCS已应用于不同人群的抑制控制研究, 并能与其他研究技术较好的结合。     

Can brain stimulation improve semantic joke comprehension?

ABSTRACT

Semantic humour involves a deviation from lexico-semantic rules that introduces ambiguity into interpretation of a situation. The left Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) has been implicated in humour processing (e.g. semantic puns, ambiguity resolution). The present study aimed to examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left IFG would enhance semantic ambiguity resolution. In two sessions, fifteen participants aged 20–35 years received either offline anodal tDCS or sham stimulation for 20?min, after which they read semantically ambiguous humorous sentences, literal (non-ambiguous) sentences, and meaningless sentences, and then performed a semantic judgment task relating to each sentence’s final word. Results showed that ambiguity resolution requires longer processing than literality. However, left IFG stimulation was ineffective in increasing ambiguity resolution. Researchers should target different brain areas in both hemispheres to further explore humour comprehension.