排序方式: 共有17条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
John Woods 《Argumentation》1988,2(4):395-408
Needed for such dialogue games as dialectic are appropriate standards of fairness and rationality. The rules of procedure of dialectic must describe a game playable by actual human participants. The present paper centers on certain idealizations of the dialectician that are not allowable. 相似文献
3.
4.
Ulrich Schimmack 《Cognition & emotion》2013,27(3):599-604
This paper re-examines Yik's (2007) hypothesis that dialectic thinking moderates aggregated but not momentary ratings of affect. A reanalysis of Yik's (2007) correlation coefficients shows that culture is a significant moderator of the correlation between ratings of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) for two of the three response formats, and for the latent correlations reported in the original article. The effect size of this difference is similar to the effect size in previous publications with aggregated measures of affect. It is concluded that Asian dialectic thinking styles moderate the correlation of both aggregated and momentary reports of PA and NA. 相似文献
5.
Franca D'Agostini 《International Journal of Philosophical Studies》2013,21(3):349-367
My discussion addresses the differences between analytic and continental philosophy concerning the use of logic and exact reasoning in philosophical practice. These differences are mainly examined in the light of the controversial dominance of Hegel's concept of logic (and theory of concept) in twentieth-century continental philosophy. The inquiry is developed in two parts. In the first (Sections 1-2), I indicate some aspects of the analytic-continental divide, pointing to the role that the topic 'logic and philosophy' plays in it. In the second part (Sections 3-6), I give a short account of the views of logic which are typical of the three main trends of continental philosophy (see Table 1). I also suggest how, with the aid of some typical analytical devices, some continental 'anti-logical' attitudes may be corrected, on their own terms. 相似文献
6.
Tanja Stähler 《International Journal of Philosophical Studies》2013,21(2):191-204
In his essay 'The Pit and the Pyramid: Introduction to Hegel's Semiology', Jacques Derrida claims that there is a privilege of speech over writing inherent in Hegel's theory of signs. In this paper, I examine Derrida's criticism. While it is to Derrida's credit that he focusses on an area of Hegel's philosophy that has hardly been analysed, his reading is problematic in several regards. After presenting Derrida's main arguments, I pose three questions, the first of which belongs to the realm of subjective spirit, the second to objective spirit, and the third to absolute spirit. I shall then show that Hegel makes several statements in favour of a privilege of writing over speech - statements that are not merely parenthetic or marginal. Moreover, those claims that Hegel makes toward any privilege of speech are in the wrong place, namely, subjective spirit, for them to represent his final point of view. 相似文献
7.
In the Shadow Side of Hope: Charisma and Mutuality in the Pastoral Care of Men with Tendencies Toward Affective Disturbance 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Douglas B. Olds 《Pastoral Psychology》2008,56(6):593-608
This paper explores dialectical relationships between affective mental disturbance and religious development in men. It then
proposes a form of pastoral engagement—the mutual encounter—with men so afflicted. In care giving, the pastor may draw on
his or her own charismatic endowment to solicit the recognition of the same within the care seeker, all the while respecting
a man’s attenuating psychosocial need for communicative boundaries and privacy. Both pastor and care seeker may engage the
care process as a mutual, continuing, and dialogic quest for authentic Christian relationship, charisma, and selfhood where each serves as “guide”
and “messenger.”
相似文献
Douglas B. OldsEmail: |
8.
Mohsen Javadi 《Topoi》2007,26(2):247-254
There are some texts about moral sentences in the Islamic logical literature especially in the logical books of Ibn Sina that
have been interpreted in completely opposite ways. Relying on these texts, some scholars take Ibn Sina to be proposing a non-cognitive
theory of ethics and to the contrary some scholars hold that he is a proponent of a sort of moral intuitionism. Reflecting
on the alleged textual evidence in Ibn Sina’s books, I propose a middle way in the interpretation that accepts the cognitive
status of the moral sentences but at the same time rejects intuitionism.
相似文献
Mohsen JavadiEmail: |
9.
《黑格尔导读》是科耶夫解读黑格尔《精神现象学》的重要成果。在这一解读中,科耶夫将黑格尔哲学发挥为三大主题:即主人—奴隶的辨证法、历史的终结与人的自由的实现,其中主人—奴隶的辩证法构成了整个解读的基础。在这一主题中,欲望、死亡、承认、劳动等内容被呈现出来,体现了科耶夫以马克思、尼采、海德格尔为中介对黑格尔哲学的创造性理解。 相似文献
10.
Bernard Flynn 《Continental Philosophy Review》2007,40(2):125-138
This article follows the development of Merleau-Ponty’s political philosophy from his 1947 text, Humanism and Terror, through a number of essays in the Adventures of the Dialectic, to the Preface to Signs published in 1959. It shows the process by which Merleau-Ponty escaped the “grip of marxism” as a philosophy of history.
It notes the link between his philosophy of history and the concrete historical events of his times, particularly the Russian
Revolution and its degeneration into Stalinism. It suggests a certain analogy between Merleau-Ponty’s reflection on the October
Revolution and Kant’s reflection on the French Revolution. The notion of the universal class of the proletariat is the guiding thread in the analyses of both Merleau-Ponty’s proximity to marxism and the process by which he frees himself
from its grip. We observe the role that this concept plays in Humanism and Terror and in the essays on Weber and Lukacs in the Adventure of the Dialectic where we eventually see its dissolution. It is argued that Merleau-Ponty arrives at a new conception of historical meaning
which is neither totalizing or empiricist. The paper concludes by presenting an outline of the direction that his philosophy
of history took after he extricated himself from marxism. This new philosophy took the form of a critical reflection on the
role of the “notion of the hero” in 20th century political philosophy in general, particularly in Heidegger and Sartre.
相似文献
Bernard FlynnEmail: |