排序方式: 共有5条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Ralph Slovenko 《Behavioral sciences & the law》1987,5(2):119-147
The role of attorneys in relationship to mental health experts is examined. Issues which are discussed include the necessity of expert testimony, selection of the expert, and the data underlying the expert opinion. In addition, the attorneys' responsibilities in presenting the mental health expert in court is discussed with reference to different elements of the trial process. 相似文献
2.
Ralph Slovenko 《Behavioral sciences & the law》1983,1(1):109-127
The health care professional must be aware of the potential hazards in writing or disclosing information about a patient or a non-patient. Two important interests are pitted against each other: dissemination of scientific information versus confidentiality. Presented is a discussion of the legal and ethical issues involved in (1) writing an article or book about a patient, (2) writing about a research subject, (3) writing about a subject of a forensic examination on behalf of the court or attorney, and (4) writing in a medical record. 相似文献
3.
R Slovenko 《Behavioral sciences & the law》1999,17(2):165-180
This paper offers a discussion of some of the nuances of mental disease or defect as required for the insanity defense in criminal law. It also compares and contrasts the mental disease or defect definitions of criminal law with those definitions used in clinical practice. It points out a general pattern of vagueness and dispute regarding the proper interpretation of the mental disability requirement in the insanity defense and in other legal provisions. It reports a variety of interpretations by courts and commentators regarding the meaning of these phrases, and it reports attempts by state legislatures to narrow the range of applicable conditions by excluding various mental or emotional states. 相似文献
4.
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis - 相似文献
5.
1