排序方式: 共有19条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Philip Kitcher 《Erkenntnis》2011,75(3):505-524
In the spirit of James and Dewey, I ask what one might want from a theory of knowledge. Much Anglophone epistemology is centered
on questions that were once highly pertinent, but are no longer central to broader human and scientific concerns. The first
sense in which epistemology without history is blind lies in the tendency of philosophers to ignore the history of philosophical
problems. A second sense consists in the perennial attraction of approaches to knowledge that divorce knowing subjects from
their societies and from the tradition of socially assembling a body of transmitted knowledge. When epistemology fails to
use the history of inquiry as a laboratory in which methodological claims can be tested, there is a third way in which it
becomes blind. Finally, lack of attention to the growth of knowledge in various domains leaves us with puzzles about the character
of the knowledge we have. I illustrate this last theme by showing how reflections on the history of mathematics can expand
our options for understanding mathematical knowledge. 相似文献
3.
Patricia Kitcher 《Pacific Philosophical Quarterly》1987,68(3-4):306-316
4.
5.
6.
7.
Philosophical Studies - 相似文献
8.
Philip Kitcher 《Nanoethics》2007,1(3):177-184
I argue that the title question needs to be taken seriously because there are important questions about how the scientific
agenda should be set. Natural answers to the question – declarations of the proper autonomy of science or expressions of faith
in market forces – are found inadequate. Instead, I propose a form of democracy with respect to scientific research that will
avoid the obvious dangers of a tyranny of ignorance. I conclude with some modest proposals about how the ideal of a democratic
science might be implemented and with a response to common objections.
相似文献
Philip KitcherEmail: |
9.
10.