排序方式: 共有7条查询结果,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1
1.
Athanassios Tzouvaras 《Studia Logica》2003,75(3):287-304
We continue our work [5] on the logic of multisets (or on the multiset semantics of linear logic), by interpreting further the additive disjunction . To this purpose we employ a more general class of processes, called free, the axiomatization of which requires a new rule (not compatible with the full LL), the cancellation rule. Disjunctive multisets are modeled as finite sets of multisets. The -Horn fragment of linear logic, with the cut rule slightly restricted, is sound with respect to this semantics. Another rule, which is a slight modification of cancellation, added to HF makes the system sound and complete. 相似文献
2.
A continuum is here a primitive notion intended to correspond precisely to a path-connected subset of the usual euclidean
space. In contrast, however, to the traditional treatment, we treat here continua not as pointsets, but as irreducible entities
equipped only with a partial ordering ≤ interpreted as parthood. Our aim is to examine what basic topological and geometric
properties of continua can be expressed in the language of ≤, and what principles we need in order to prove elementary facts
about them. Surprisingly enough ≤ suffices to formulate the very heart of continuity (=jumpless and gapless transitions) in
a general setting. Further, using a few principles about ≤ (together with the axioms of ZFC), we can define points, joins,
meets and infinite closeness. Most important, we can develop a dimension theory based on notions like path, circle, line (=one-dimensional
continuum), simple line and surface (=two-dimensional continuum), recovering thereby in a rigorous way Poincaré's well-known
intuitive idea that dimension expresses the ways in which a continuum can be torn apart. We outline a classification of lines
according to the number of circles and branching points they contain.
The ordering (C,≤) is a topped and bottomed, atomic, almost dense and complete partial ordering, weaker than a lattice. Continuous
transformations from C to C are also defined in a natural way and results about them are proved.
The key notions on which the dimension theory is based are the “minimal extensions of continua”, or “joins”, and the “splittings
of continua over subcontinua”.
This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
3.
Athanassios Tzouvaras 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》1998,27(1):85-108
We extend the ordinary logic of knowledge based on the operator K and the system of axioms S5 by adding a new operator U, standing for the agent utters , and certain axioms and a rule for U, forming thus a new system KU. The main advantage of KU is that we can express in it intentions of the speaker concerning the truth or falsehood of the claims he utters and analyze them logically. Specifically we can express in the new language various notions of lying, as well as of telling the truth. Consequently, as long as lying or telling the truth about a fact is an intentional mode of the speaker, we can resolve the Liar paradox, or at least some of its variants, turning it into an ordinary (false or true) sentence. Also, using Kripke structures analogous to those employed by S. Kraus and D. Lehmann in [3] for modelling the logic of knowledge and belief, we offer a sound and complete semantics for KU. 相似文献
4.
Athanassios Tzouvaras 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》1996,25(6):581-596
Let ? be the ordinary deduction relation of classical first-order logic. We provide an “analytic” subrelation ?3 of ? which for propositional logic is defined by the usual “containment” criterion $$\Gamma \vdash ^a \varphi iff \Gamma \vdash \varphi and Atom(\varphi ) \subseteq Atom(\Gamma ),$$ whereas for predicate logic, ?a is defined by the extended criterion $$\Gamma \vdash ^a \varphi iff \Gamma \vdash \varphi and Atom(\varphi ) \subseteq ' Atom(\Gamma ),$$ where Atom(?) $ \subseteq '$ Atom(Γ) means that every atomic formula occurring in ? “essentially occurs” also in Γ. If Γ, ? are quantifier-free, then the notions “occurs” and “essentially occurs” for atoms between Γ and ? coincide. If ? is formalized by Gentzen's calculus of sequents, then we show that ?a is axiomatizable by a proper fragment of analytic inference rules. This is mainly due to cut elimination. By “analytic inference rule” we understand here a rule r such that, if the sequent over the line is analytic, then so is the sequent under the line. We also discuss the notion of semantic relevance as contrasted to the previous syntactic one. We show that when introducing semantic sequents as axioms, i.e. when extending the pure logical axioms and rules by mathematical ones, the property of syntactic relevance is lost, since cut elimination no longer holds. We conclude that no purely syntactic notion of analytic deduction can ever replace successfully the complex semantico-syntactic deduction we already possess. 相似文献
5.
Athanassios Tzouvaras 《Studia Logica》2005,80(1):121-141
We show that the notion of cardinality of a set is independent from that of wellordering, and that reasonable total notions of cardinality exist in every model of ZF where the axiom of choice fails. Such notions are either definable in a simple and natural way, or non-definable, produced by forcing. Analogous cardinality notions exist in nonstandard models of arithmetic admitting nontrivial automorphisms. Certain motivating phenomena from quantum mechanics are also discussed in the Appendix. 相似文献
6.
7.
1