排序方式: 共有8条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
2.
This essay explores the history of studies in analytical philosophy in China since the beginning of the last century, by dividing
into three phases. It shows that, in these phases, analytic philosophy was always at a disadvantage in confronting serious
challenges coming from both Chinese traditional philosophy and modern philosophical trends. The authors argue that Chinese
philosophers have both done preliminary studies and offered their own analyses of various problems as well as some new applications
of analytic philosophy especially in the latest period. Meanwhile, Chinese traditional philosophy was always trying to adjust
its cultural mentality in the struggle with analytic philosophy, and accommodated in its own way the rationalistic spirit
and scientific method represented in analytic philosophy. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
The compatibility between Western democracy and other cultures, and the desirability of democracy, are two important problems
in democratic theory. Following an insight from John Rawls’s later philosophy, and using some key passages in Mencius, I will show the compatibility between a ‘thin’ version of liberal democracy and Confucianism. Moreover, elaborating on Mencius’s
ideas of the responsibility of government for the physical and moral well-being of the people, the respectability of the government
and the ruling elite, and the competence-based limited political participation, I shall explore the Mencian criticisms of
some ‘thick’ democratic ideas. Through the discussion in this paper, I hope to show the relevance of Confucianism to contemporary
political philosophy and society.
相似文献
Tongdong BaiEmail: |
6.
Tongdong Bai 《Dao》2010,9(4):375-390
Confucius argued for the centrality of the superior man’s political duty to his fellow human beings and to the state, while
Socrates suggested that the superior man (the philosopher) may have no such political duty. However, Confucius also suggested
that one not enter or stay—let alone save—a troubled state, while Socrates stayed in an unjust state, apparently fulfilling
his political duty to the state by accepting an unjust verdict. In this essay, I will try to show how Confucius could solve
these apparent contradictions. I will then examine the reasons Socrates directly and indirectly offers to resolve his seemingly
conflicting positions in light of the discussion of the Confucian case. This article is a first step toward a deeper understanding
of both Confucius and Socrates (Plato) by way of comparative studies, and of the general issue of a superior man’s political
duty to a bad state. 相似文献
7.
Tongdong Bai 《亚洲哲学》2009,19(1):85-99
The apparent conflict between some fundamental ideas of Confucianism and of rights seems to render Confucianism incompatible with rights. I will illustrate the general strategies, based upon an insight of the later Rawls, to solve the incompatibility problem. I will then show how these strategies can help us to develop a Confucian account of animal rights, which, by way of example, demonstrates how Confucianism can endorse and develop unique and constructive accounts of most rights that are commonly recognized today. 相似文献
8.
1