Skill, strength, handedness, and fatigue

Thirty male subjects, 20 of whom were self-classified left-handers and 10 right-handers, were tested on a grip-strength task and a handwriting task with each hand, both under normal conditions and in a situation of induced experimental fatigue. On the basis of questionnaire scores, the left-handers were sub-divided into two groups comprising the 10 most left-handed and the 10 least left-handed subjects. The test of grip strength showed a small but significant deterioration in performance of both hands from fatigue. With the handwriting task, a similar significantly adverse effect of fatigue was recorded for all groups as well as a large significant difference in performance between the preferred and nonpreferred hands under normal conditions, which decreased under fatigue. An explanation of these differential effects is discussed in terms of the greater efficiency of the preferred hand in the highly developed skill of handwriting.     

The Measurement of Handedness by Preference and Performance Tests

Hand preference and hand proficiency were compared on 50 male subjects (30 self-classified left-handers and 20 self-classified right-handers) according to their responses to a 20 item questionnaire and their performances on a handwriting and a grip-strength task. Performance differences between the two sides for each group were not related to overall preference assessments but were positively associated with hand preferences on corresponding questionnaire items. Distributions of the performance differences between the two sides for the right- and left-handers were well separated for handwriting but completely overlapped for grip strength. Significant correlations between the performances on each side were recorded on both tasks. The results stress the importance of using the same criteria in making preference vs. performance comparisons and highlight the need to recognize and control the influence of previous training or experience.     

HANDEDNESS AND CONFORMITY IN A SMALL ISOLATED COMMUNITY*

The inhabitants of Tristan da Cunha are a socially and geographically isolated community, highly inter-related by blood or marriage with a large average family size. The handedness characteristics of a sample of 76 people out of the total Tristan population of 264 were assessed on eight criteria by personal interview. All subjects wrote with the right hand and only two could be classified as otherwise left-handed (i.e. 2.6%). Seven out of eight of those interviewed who claimed a left-handed parent were themselves right-handed and had only right-handed brothers or sisters. It is concluded that any genetic factor determining left-handedness must be very weak and a preferred explanation of the findings is offered in terms of social pressures such as (i) deference to authority and (ii) group conformity.     

The Specificity of Motor Skill and Manual Asymmetry: A Review of the Evidence and Its Implications

Results of investigations on gaining control of limb movements are reviewed, and their contribution to understanding the development of manual asymmetries is discussed in relation to the discrimination and programming of appropriate neuromuscular resources. An examination of the relevant evidence on number and types of manual asymmetries recorded provides strong grounds for concluding that where asymmetries occur, they simply represent a further example of the well-documented activity-specific nature of motor skills and of the extremely lengthy periods of learning or experience needed for their acquisition and perfection. This specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry also readily accounts for most of the discrepancy usually reported between assessments of hand preference and performance differences between hands, because these alternative measures of handedness have rarely employed the same range or variety of tasks.     

The effect of training and handedness on the performance of two simple motor tasks

In the first experimental series nine right-handed and nine left-handed subjects were tested on each side on two tasks. The first task measured the accuracy of reproduction of pressure in attempted extension of the elbow joint, and the second the speed of oscillation of attempted flexion and extension of the elbow joint. The results showed no significant difference in performance on the two sides in the accuracy task but a significant difference in performance on the speed task.

In the second experimental series the effect of 15-minutes daily training on each of two tasks over a four-week period was investigated on six subjects. The two tasks were the same as those used in the first experimental series, and attempted movement at the metacarpo-phalangeal joint as well as the elbow joint was studied. The mean results of all subjects showed a significant reduction in the mean error of the “accuracy” task over the training period for both the finger and arm. However, further analysis suggests that this may have been due to a clarifying of the subjects' concept of the target value rather than an improvement in his ability to grade the appropriate muscle contractions. A significant increase in the mean speed of oscillation over the training period was also recorded for both finger and arm. This improvement was accompanied in most instances by a corresponding decrease in variation of cycle length of the individual oscillations, which is interpreted as an improvement in the subjects' “timing” of the appropriate muscle contractions.     

“Handedness” and skill

The variability of handedness with different tasks is discussed. Experiments are described which show under what conditions handedness becomes evident. Tasks involving three different levels of complexity were used. The simplest task measured the accuracy with which a particular pressure could be reproduced in isometric contraction of the flexors of the index finger on each side in 21 female subjects. In the second situation, the maximum speed of making an attempted tapping movement under the same conditions, was measured in ten of the same subjects using the same muscle group alternating with its antagonists. The same ten subjects were also tested on an aiming task which provided the third level of complexity. The results suggest that differences in performance between the two sides only occur where “timing” or the serial organization of muscle activity is required and that such differences may be due to training.

Whether handedness is inherited or acquired is briefly discussed, and a second series of experiments using the same tasks as before were carried out on one female and nine male subjects. In this instance, the first two tests were used on the big toe of each side as well as the index finger. The results confirm that differences in performance between the two sides on these tasks can be adequately explained in terms of usage or training.

The hypothesis that “timing” is therefore important in the learning of any movement where serial muscle contractions arc involved was tested and confirmed in a third experimental series. The consistency of timing of the application of force in turning a crank handle at maximum speed was measured in five male subjects before and after training. The implications of the results are discussed in relation to other researches on skills.