排序方式: 共有11条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Dag Prawitz 《Topoi》2012,31(1):9-16
What is the appropriate notion of truth for sentences whose meanings are understood in epistemic terms such as proof or ground
for an assertion? It seems that the truth of such sentences has to be identified with the existence of proofs or grounds,
and the main issue is whether this existence is to be understood in a temporal sense as meaning that we have actually found
a proof or a ground, or if it could be taken in an abstract, tenseless sense. Would the latter alternative amount to realism
with respect to proofs or grounds in a way that would be contrary to the supposedly anti-realistic standpoint underlying the
epistemic understanding of linguistic expressions? Before discussing this question, I shall consider reasons for construing
linguistic meaning epistemically and relations between such reasons and reasons for taking an anti-realist point of view towards
the discourse in question. 相似文献
3.
Dag Prawitz 《Synthese》2006,148(3):507-524
According to a main idea of Gentzen the meanings of the logical constants are reflected by the introduction rules in his system
of natural deduction. This idea is here understood as saying roughly that a closed argument ending with an introduction is
valid provided that its immediate subarguments are valid and that other closed arguments are justified to the extent that
they can be brought to introduction form. One main part of the paper is devoted to the exact development of this notion. Another
main part of the paper is concerned with a modification of this notion as it occurs in Michael Dummett’s book The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. The two notions are compared and there is a discussion of how they fare as a foundation for a theory of meaning. It is noted
that Dummett’s notion has a simpler structure, but it is argued that it is less appropriate for the foundation of a theory
of meaning, because the possession of a valid argument for a sentence in Dummett’s sense is not enough to be warranted to
assert the sentence. 相似文献
4.
5.
Topoi - We may try to explain proofs as chains of valid inference, but the concept of validity needed in such an explanation cannot be the traditional one. For an inference to be legitimate in a... 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
Dag Prawitz 《Synthese》2012,187(3):887-898
The traditional picture of logic takes it for granted that ??valid arguments have a fundamental epistemic significance??, but neither model theory nor traditional proof theory dealing with formal system has been able to give an account of this significance. Since valid arguments as usually understood do not in general have any epistemic significance, the problem is to explain how and why we can nevertheless use them sometimes to acquire knowledge. It is suggested that we should distinguish between arguments and acts of inferences and that we have to reconsider the latter notion to arrive at the desired explanation. More precisely, the notions should be developed so that the following relationship holds: one gets in possession of a ground for a conclusion by inferring it from premisses for which one already has grounds, provided that the inference in question is valid. The paper proposes explications of the concepts of ground and deductively valid inference so that this relationship holds as a conceptual truth. Logical validity of inference is seen as a special case of deductive validity, but does not add anything as far as epistemic significance is concerned??it resides already in the deductively valid inferences. 相似文献
9.
10.
Analysis of data related to selection of a nursing home by 411 families of nursing home residents led to the conclusion that steps selected and taken by consumers in the selection of a home were associated with their subsequent satisfaction with the home. Satisfaction was greater (a) for families in agreement about the home selected and (b) for families who investigated all homes in an area before selecting one. Less satisfied were families (a) who were forced to make an immediate decision about placement following illness of a patient, (b) who felt they lacked sufficient time to investigate homes, and (c) who chose the first home with space available. 相似文献