排序方式: 共有29条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Nuyen AT 《The Journal of religious ethics》2000,28(1):119-135
The philosophers' tendency to characterize euthanasia interms of either the right or the responsibility to die is, in some ways, problematic. Stepping outside of the analytic framework, the author draws out the implications of the ethics of Emmanuel Levinas for the euthanasia debate, tracing the way Levinas's position differs not only from the philosophical consensus but also from the theological one. The article shows that, according to Levinas, there is no ethical case for suicide or assisted suicide. Death cannot be assumed or chosen—not only because suicide is a logically and metaphysically contradictory concept but also because in the choice of death ethical responsibility turns into irresponsibility. However, since Levinas holds that one must be responsible to the point of expiation, he can be said to approve certain actions that may have the consequence of hastening death. 相似文献
6.
A. T. Nuyen 《The Southern journal of philosophy》1989,27(4):495-510
7.
8.
A. T. Nuyen 《Human Studies》1994,17(4):419-432
9.
10.