Subjective Social Status of High School Freshmen in the Transitional Period: the Impact of Extraversion

Applied Research in Quality of Life - Most adolescents successfully adjust to common school transitions, but face some psychological risks. We explored the subjective social status trajectory of...     

创伤暴露程度、主观害怕程度对儿童创伤后应激障碍影响的追踪研究:社会支持的调节作用

为了考察创伤暴露程度、主观害怕程度、社会支持与创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）之间的纵向关系,本研究采用创伤暴露程度问卷、主观害怕程度问卷、社会支持问卷与儿童创伤后应激障碍症状量表对雅安地震半年后的303名小学生进行测查,并于震后一年半时进行再次测查。逐步回归分析的结果发现,创伤暴露程度对地震半年后的PTSD具有显著的正向预测作用,对震后一年半的PTSD没有显著的预测作用;无论是震后半年还是一年半,主观害怕都可以加剧PTSD、社会支持都可以缓解PTSD;社会支持在创伤暴露程度与PTSD之间不起显著的调节作用,但却可以显著地调节主观害怕程度对震后一年半的PTSD的影响,表现为主观害怕程度对震后一年半的PTSD的正向预测作用随着社会支持水平的增加而降低。     

Tolerance or Hospitality?

Facing the development of pluralistic cultures and the conflict of varied civilizations, we should examine political theory frameworks, particularly as concerns the construction of world order. On the problem of “tolerance or hospitality,” tolerance has been the target of opposition. Jacques Derrida deconstructs this concept and supports Immanuel Kant’s notion of hospitality instead of tolerance. However, Jürgen Habermas advocates reconstructing the concept of tolerance, although he does note its limits. We should regard hospitality as the fundamental spirit of international relations and take the notion of “Seeking Sameness and Respecting Diversity” as a principle for handling relations between different cultures.     

马克思的"感性世界"理论与现象学运动

The epistemological problems that are implicit in Marx’s theory on the “sensible world” indicate that Marx’s philosophy in fact contains within itself the topics of pure philosophy, but Marx did not involve himself in these topics. Through comparing with Husserl’s epistemological critique and Heidegger’s existentialism, we can clearly see that there are theoretical spaces in which we can develop Marx’s philosophy to the realm of pure philosophy, however, we must devote our creative efforts to the exploration of the spaces. Translated by Yang Xiaohua from Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究(Philosophical Research), 2006, (6): 20–26     

“凭感觉”的热情与能力：社会认知内容的生理线索

热情与能力是解析社会认知的普适性框架,同现实情境中诸多要素存在着关联。与众多明显带有社会属性的要素相比,源自面孔或者颜色的视觉、声音的听觉、身体姿态的动觉、温度变化的肤觉等生理线索,也可以跟热情与能力的社会知觉产生关联,这个过程可能基于生理–社会的知觉联结假设或者知觉启动假设而发生。以生理–社会的知觉关系为切入点,热情与能力更能发挥解析具体情境的灵活性。侧重典型生理线索的挖掘、建立生理线索同热情与能力的组态关系,以及这种关系对社会性偏向的影响,将有助于推进热情与能力融入更为广泛的社会应用之中。     

The effect of brand anthropomorphism,brand distinctiveness,and warmth on brand attitude: A mediated moderation model

Brand anthropomorphism is one of the most widely used marketing strategies, and numerous studies have confirmed the positive effect of anthropomorphism on consumers' brand attitude. However, anthropomorphism does not always produce positive effects in particular conditions. This study focuses on the interaction effect of brand anthropomorphism and brand distinctiveness on brand attitude and tests the mediating effect of warmth and competence using the Stereotype Content Model. The results of two experiments show that brand anthropomorphism positively predicts consumers' brand attitude, and brand position (distinctiveness vs. popularity) moderates this relationship. Anthropomorphism may improve consumers' attitudes when the brand is positioned to be popular but has no effect on consumers' attitudes when the brand is positioned to be distinctive. Additionally, warmth (not competence) mediates the interaction effect of anthropomorphism and brand position on brand attitude. This study expands the extant knowledge on anthropomorphism and stereotypes in the field of consumption psychology and provides marketers with more rational strategies when applying anthropomorphism in marketing campaigns.     

文化哲学的本体论诉求——卡西尔文化哲学思想探析

当代德国著名文化哲学家卡西尔在《符号形式的哲学》一书中,从符号学和语言学的角度对文化哲学做出了迄今最为系统的本体论论证,从而真正使文化哲学超越了文化学或文化人类学的研究视域。卡西尔认为,文化哲学同样具有自身的存在论根据,不过在存在论问题上,它与传统哲学的存在论既有密切的联系,又有根本的区别。他指出,人的活动是一种能够创造和使用符号的活动,这种活动创造出了一个为人所特有的符号系统,这个符号系统是“新的实在之维”或文化世界,其中语言是文化世界得以存在的普遍性因素。不过,卡西尔的文化本体论证明也有一个明显的缺憾,即忽视了人的符号世界与客观物质世界的关系。马克思没有创立文化哲学,但马克思的实践哲学的基本理论却能够为文化哲学的创立提供更为坚实的理论基础和更为丰富的思想资源。     

中国人压力应对研究:基于主位与客位的视角

目前,学界探索中国人的应对大致有两种方式:客位研究与主位研究。客位研究分析中国文化在以下几个方面对国人应对行为和心理的影响,分别是应对的文化环境和自我特质、压力来源、应对方式、应对结果。研究结果得出有关应对的客观知识,揭示中国人的应对实践。但是由于客位研究注重理论的普适性,所以其研究成果与中国人应对实质并不十分契合。主位研究从传统文化中的儒家、道家、佛家哲学思想提取应对观,其成果更深入的分析了国人应对的实质。但是,主位研究下的应对观过于注重直观体验,并且当今中国人行为心理模式也发生了变化,这些因素势必导致主位研究的缺陷。两种研究方式各有利弊,未来的研究应把两种方式结合起来,取长补短。