Hemodynamic characteristics of young men at risk for hypertension at rest and during laboratory stressors.

Examined hemodynamic activity--at rest, during mental arithmetic, and during hand cold pressor--in young men varying in risk for hypertension. Classification into low-risk (n = 72), moderate-risk (n = 20), and high-risk (n = 13) groups was based on resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and parental history of essential hypertension (PH). Dependent variables were SBP, diastolic BP (DBP), heart rate, and rate-pressure product (RPP). Progressively greater hemodynamic activity was seen across risk groups at rest and during the tasks. Risk groups differed significantly in SBP, DBP, and RPP at baseline (ps less than .003) and in size of response to mental arithmetic (ps less than .05) but not to cold pressor. These relationships were either absent or weaker when using either risk factor alone to form risk groups. These findings suggest that hemodynamic reactivity to mental stress is predicted better by a combination of resting SBP and PH than by either risk factor alone and that physiological reactivity may be an important accompaniment of increased risk for hypertension.     

Cardiovascular responses to occupational stress in male medical students: a paradigm for ambulatory monitoring studies.

Hemodynamic responses to systematic variations in occupational stress were examined using ambulatory blood pressure monitors (ABPMs). The goals of this study were (a) to illustrate the effectiveness of employing naturally occurring, controlled variations in psychological stress levels in studies incorporating ABPMs and (b) to document the patterns of cardiovascular responses to acute examination stress in medical students. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, rate-pressure product, and mood states were measured before, during, and after low-stress (lecture) and high-stress (examination) work in 44 healthy male medical students. The lecture day was characterized by stable patterns of cardiovascular activity across all three periods. Hemodynamic activity and reports of activation and distress were greater on the examination day than on the lecture day. Cardiovascular activity during the preexamination period was as high as that seen during the examination period itself, indicating an anticipatory stress effect. Pressor activity decreased after the examination, although some residual chronotropic activity was seen. Systematic changes in physiological responses to controlled variations in the level of this naturalistic stressor support the use of this paradigm for other ABPM studies. The elevations in preexamination responses seen here suggest the need to consider prestressor experiences in such studies.     

Bridging psychology and biology. The analysis of individuals in groups

Biological systems are particularly prone to variation, and the authors argue that such variation must be regarded as important data in its own right. The authors describe a method in which individual differences are studied within the framework of a general theory of the population as a whole and illustrate how this method can be used to address three types of issues: the nature of the mechanisms that give rise to a specific ability, such as mental imagery; the role of psychological or biological mediators of environmental challenges, such as the biological bases for differences in dispositional mood; and the existence of processes that have nonadditive effects with behavioral and physiological variables, such as factors that modulate the response to stress and its effects on the immune response.     

Are Large Physiological Reactions to Acute Psychological Stress Always Bad for Health?

How we react physiologically to stress has long been considered to have implications for our health. There is now persuasive evidence that individuals who show large cardiovascular reactions to stress are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease, particularly hypertension. By implication, low reactivity is protective or benign. However, there is recent evidence that low reactivity may predict elevated risk for a range of adverse health outcomes, such as depression, obesity, poor self-reported health and compromised immunity. In addition, low cortisol and cardiovascular reactivity may be a characteristic of individuals with addictions to tobacco and alcohol, as well as those at risk of addiction and those who relapse from abstinence. Our ideas about reactivity may have to be revised in the light of such findings.     

Coping Self‐Efficacy and Psychological Distress Following the Oklahoma City Bombing1

Findings from a study of 27 victims of the Oklahoma City bombing are reported. This research focused on the importance of subjective appraisals of coping self‐efficacy in predicting psychological distress following this tragedy. Results supported the hypothesis that judgments of coping self‐eficacy taken 2 months after the bombing added significantly to the explanation of general and trauma‐related distress after controlling for income, social support, threat of death, and loss of resources. Coping self‐eficacy judgments taken I year later were also important in explaining psychological distress after controlling for loss of resources and social‐support perceptions. Although coping self‐efficacy perceptions taken at 2 months were related to distress levels 1 year later, they did not remain significant in a regression analysis controlling for loss of resources and income. Implications of these findings for post‐terrorist bombing interventions are discussed.     

Hypertension risk and caffeine's effect on cardiovascular activity during mental stress in young men

Examined the cardiovascular effects of caffeine plus behavioral stress in men low versus high in risk of essential hypertension. Caffeine (3.3 mg/kg, equivalent to 2 to 3 cups of coffee) or placebo was given on alternate days to 19 low-risk men (negative for parental hypertension and low-normal resting blood pressure, BP) and 20 high-risk men (positive history, high-normal BP). Forty minutes later, each worked for 15 min on a demanding psychomotor task during which BP, cardiac output, and vascular resistance were determined. During rest, caffeine raised vascular resistance in both groups. During the task, it supra-additively increased the systolic BP response by enhancing the rise in cardiac output, producing equivalent BP rises in both groups. Due to the higher resting pressures of the high-risk men, caffeine plus the task resulted in 50% of these having transient BP of 140/90 mg Hg or greater. Caffeine in combination with mental stress may produce undesirable BP in those at risk for hypertension.     

Caffeine enhances the physiological response to occupational stress in medical students

Caffeine (3.3 mg/kg) was tested against a placebo in 20 male medical students during periods of low (no exams) versus high (final exams) work stress. On each of 8 test days, heart rate and blood pressure were measured at baseline and over a 40-min postdrug interval; immediately afterward, blood was drawn to test plasma cortisol and serum lipid concentrations. Exams increased heart rate (p less than .005) and systolic blood pressure (p less than .02). Caffeine decreased heart rate (p less than .0001) and increased systolic blood pressure (p less than .005), diastolic blood pressure (p less than .0001), plasma cortisol levels (p less than .01), and serum cholesterol levels (p less than .02). Caffeine effects were additive with those of exams, and together they increased the number of men showing systolic blood pressures in the borderline hypertensive range. Thus, caffeine use during periods of increased occupational stress may enhance the cumulative stress response.