Self-image,perception of peers' risk acceptance and risky shift

Twelve four-person female groups of subjects displaying the typical underestimation of their peers' (relative to their own) risk acceptance were compared with twelve groups of subjects who (slightly) overestimated their peers' risk acceptance. Risk level was measured by responses to a set of hypothetical decision situations known to elicit risky shift on the basis of previous research. Risky shift following group discussion was not found to be different for the two types of groups, casting doubt on the widely suggested role of peer underestimation in risky shift. Nor was risky shift affected by whether or not group members stated their individual decisions publicly at the close of discussion. Larger group risky shifts were accompanied by higher self-ratings given by group members on a number of polarity scales. In discussing the findings, we outline an explanation of group-induced shifts in risk taking, emphasizing the motivational and informational inducements provided by group discussion whereby group members come to discard their prior positions in favor of more aspired ones.     

Factors limiting the generality of the risky-shift phenomenon

While a considerable amount of research has centered on explaining the risky shift (enhancement of risk acceptance through group discussion; see, for example, Dion, Baron, and Miller, 1970), few studies have investigated the generality of the phenomenon. Three of several ways in which the laboratory context is usually lacking of reality are: (a) The decision consequences are imaginary, as in the ‘Choice-Dilemma’ situations used in most of the risky-shift research; (b) the decision consequences - even if they are real (e.g. money) - are slight; and (c) the decisions are made for oneself (whereas in real life many decisions involve agents acting on behalf of others). The present study was designed to investigate the effects of the above three factors - type of incentive, magnitude of stake and decision target - using a betting task as the decision situation.     

Die Interpretation naturaler und sozialer Regelkreise in der marxistischen Philosophie

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

ATTITUDES OF SOUTH AFRICANS TOWARDS VARIOUS NATIONAL AND RACIAL GROUPS

Attitudes des Sud-Africains envers différents groupes nationaux et raciaux. En 1965, puis en 1966, un échantillon de 236 Sud-Africains blancs, ont jugé une série de 22 concepts qui désignaient principalement des groupes ethniques et diverses nationalités, à L'aide du Différenciateur Sémantique comprenant 20 paires d'adjectifs antonymes. Les résultats montrent que les attitudes à L'égard d'autres groupes ethniques sont relativement stables d'une année sur L'autre. Ils montrent, de plus, que c'est L'image du groupe en tant que tel qui détermine les attitudes des sujets à son égard, et non les différentes appellations, péjoratives ou laudatives, qui ont été utilisées pour le désigner. Une analyse factorielle a permis d'extraire trois facteurs: Image positive, Autoritatisme, Race non-blanche. Une seconde analyse factorielle, qui a porté sur les adjectifs utilisés dans le différenciateur sémantique, donne également trois facteurs: Activité, Valeur, Raisonnement, qui influencent la catégorisation des groupes ethniques visés. En conclusion, les AA. montrent que le Différenciateur Sémantique permet une analyse beaucoup plus fine que L'Echelle de Distance Sociale de Bogardus, des attitudes à L'égard des groupes raciaux et nationaux.     

Clinical interpretation: The hermeneutics of medicine

I argue that clinical medicine can best be understood not as a purified science but as a hermeneutical enterprise: that is, as involved with the interpretation of texts. The literary critic reading a novel, the judge asked to apply a law, must arrive at a coherent reading of their respective texts. Similarly, the physician interprets the text of the ill person: clinical signs and symptoms are read to ferret out their meaning, the underlying disease. However, I suggest that the hermeneutics of medicine is rendered uniquely complex by its wide variety of textual forms. I discuss four in turn: the experiential text of illness as lived out by the patient; the narrative text constituted during history-taking; the physical text of the patient's body as objectively examined; the instrumental text constructed by diagnostic technologies. I further suggest that certain flaws in modern medicine arise from its refusal of a hermeneutic self-understanding. In seeking to escape all interpretive subjectivity, medicine has threatened to expunge its primary subject — the living, experiencing patient.     

THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY AS A MODEL FOR STRUCTURING THE RELATIONS BETWEEN SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY

Abstract. A strategy for deeding systematically with such complex relationships as those between science and theology is presented after a brief overview of the historical record and illustrated in terms of the concept of divinity. The application of that strategy to the title relationships yields a multilogical/multilevel solution which presents certain analogies to or isomorphisms with the doctrine of the Trinity. These concern mainly the multilogical/multilevel character of both conceptualizations and the relational and contextual reasoning required to conceive them. Furthermore, certain characteristics of the doctrine facilitate the dialogue between theologians and scientists on account of their similarity with such scientific concepts as diversity in unity, multiplicity of relationships, nonseparability, and nonclassical logic.