排序方式: 共有6条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Engineers must deal with risks and uncertainties as a part of their professional work and, in particular, uncertainties are
inherent to engineering models. Models play a central role in engineering. Models often represent an abstract and idealized
version of the mathematical properties of a target. Using models, engineers can investigate and acquire understanding of how
an object or phenomenon will perform under specified conditions. This paper defines the different stages of the modeling process
in engineering, classifies the various sources of uncertainty that arise in each stage, and discusses the categories into
which these uncertainties fall. The paper then considers the way uncertainty and modeling are approached in science and the
criteria for evaluating scientific hypotheses, in order to highlight the very different criteria appropriate for the development
of models and the treatment of the inherent uncertainties in engineering. Finally, the paper puts forward nine guidelines
for the treatment of uncertainty in engineering modeling. 相似文献
2.
In this paper, we present a Capabilities-based Approach to the acceptability and the tolerability of risks posed by natural and man-made hazards. We argue that judgments about the acceptability and/or tolerability of such risks should be based on an evaluation of the likely societal impact of potential hazards, defined in terms of the expected changes in the capabilities of individuals. Capabilities refer to the functionings, or valuable doings and beings, individuals are able to achieve given available personal, material, and social resources. The likely impact of a hazard on individuals' capabilities should, we argue, be compared against two separate thresholds. The first threshold specifies the minimum level of capabilities attainment that is acceptable in principle for individuals to have in the aftermath of a hazard over any period of time. This threshold captures the level that individuals' capabilities ideally should not fall below. A risk is acceptable if the probability that the attained capabilities will be less than the acceptable level is sufficiently small. In practice, it can be tolerable for some individuals to temporarily fall below the acceptable threshold, provided this situation of lower capabilities attainment is temporary, reversible, and the probability that capabilities will fall below a tolerability threshold is sufficiently small. This second, tolerable threshold delimits an absolute minimum level of capabilities attainment below which no individual in a society should ever fall, regardless of whether that level of capabilities attainment is temporary or reversible. In this paper, we describe and justify this Capabilities-based Approach to the acceptability and tolerability of risks. We argue that the proposed theoretical framework avoids the limitations in current approaches to acceptable risk. The proposed approach focuses the attention of risk analysts directly on what should be our primary concern when judging the acceptability and the tolerability of risks, namely, how risks impact the well-being of individuals in a society. Also, our Capabilities-based Approach offers a transparent, easily communicable way for determining the acceptability and the tolerability of risks. 相似文献
3.
This paper proposes a Capabilities-based Approach to guide hazard mitigation efforts. First, a discussion is provided of the criteria that should be met by an adequate framework for formulating public policy and allocating resources. This paper shows why a common decision-aiding tool, Cost-benefit Analysis, fails to fulfill such criteria. A Capabilities-based Approach to hazard mitigation is then presented, drawing on the framework originally developed in the context of development economics and policy. The focus of a Capabilities-based Approach is protecting and promoting the well-being of individuals. Capabilities are dimensions of well-being and specified in terms of functionings. Functionings capture the various things of value an individual does or becomes in his or her life, including being alive, being healthy, and being sheltered. Capabilities refer to the real achievability of specific functionings. In the context of hazard mitigation, from a Capabilities-based Approach, decision- and policy-makers should consider the acceptability and tolerability of risks along with the affectability of hazards when determining policy formulation and resource allocation. Finally, the paper shows how the proposed approach satisfies the required criteria, and overcomes the limitations of Cost-benefit Analysis, while maintaining its strengths. 相似文献
4.
Science and Engineering Ethics - The development of the curriculum for engineering education (course requirements as well as extra-curricular activities like study abroad and internships) should be... 相似文献
5.
Within philosophy there has been little discussion of the risks associated with natural events such as earthquakes. The first
objective of this paper is to demonstrate why such risks should be the subject of more sustained philosophical interest. We
argue that we cannot simply apply to risks associated with natural events those insights and frameworks for moral evaluation
developed in the literature considering ordinary risks, technological risks and the risks posed by anthropogenic climate change.
The second objective of this paper is to identify and develop a framework for the moral evaluation of the source of the risks
associated with natural events, or the actions which sustain and impact such risks. Our discussion concentrates on the ways
the construction and modification of built and natural environments can alter the probability of occurrence of natural events
and the character and magnitude of the impact that such events have. We then argue for the need to develop a standard of reasonable
care for decisions about the built and modified natural environment, which accounts for technical and resource constraints,
as well as the place of natural hazard mitigation in public policy. 相似文献
6.
Knowledge of the responsibilities of engineers is the foundation for answering ethical questions about the work of engineers. This paper defines the responsibilities of engineers by considering what constitutes the nature of engineering as a particular form of activity. Specifically, this paper focuses on the ethical responsibilities of engineers qua engineers. Such responsibilities refer to the duties acquired in virtue of being a member of a group. We examine the practice of engineering, drawing on the idea of practices developed by philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, and show how the idea of a practice is important for identifying and justifying the responsibilities of engineers. To demonstrate the contribution that knowledge of the responsibilities of engineers makes to engineering ethics, a case study from structural engineering is discussed. The discussion of the failure of the Sleipner A Platform off the coast of Norway in 1991 demonstrates how the responsibilities of engineers can be derived from knowledge of the nature of engineering and its context. 相似文献
1