排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Faulhaber Anja K. Dittmer Anke Blind Felix Wächter Maximilian A. Timm Silja Sütfeld Leon R. Stephan Achim Pipa Gordon König Peter 《Science and engineering ethics》2019,25(2):399-418
Science and Engineering Ethics - Ethical thought experiments such as the trolley dilemma have been investigated extensively in the past, showing that humans act in utilitarian ways, trying to cause... 相似文献
2.
Joel Dittmer 《Res Publica》2009,15(1):33-51
Whereas right-libertarians do not think that it is a requirement of justice that we raise revenues for persons with disabilities, both left-libertarians and liberal egalitarians think that there is such a requirement. An issue remains for the latter two theorists—how ought we to raise this revenue? Liberal egalitarians typically endorse either universal taxation or taxation of the wealthy. Left-libertarians, on the other hand, cannot so easily appeal to the methods of universal taxation and taxation of the wealthy, as they are illegitimately coercive. One such method left open to the left-libertarian is one proposed by Michael Otsuka. He argues that both left-libertarians and liberal egalitarians should find the method of taxation of the unjust to be a reasonably strong way of raising revenue. In this paper, I point out problems with Otsuka’s argument, as well as directly criticize the method of taxation of the unjust. 相似文献
1