The effect of multiple SΔ periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: V. Effect of periods of complete darkness and of occasional omissions of food presentations

In pigeons under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement, responding during most of the interval can be suppressed by stimulus conditions never present when a response is promptly followed by reinforcing stimuli. When the external stimuli obtaining immediately before reinforcement are presented during brief probe periods in the course of the interval, the rate of responding in the probe depends on the temporal position of the probe during the interval; the rate of responding is lower during a probe early in the interval than during one late in the interval. The present experiments show that the temporal dependency still holds (1) in birds with no experience under unmodified fixed-interval schedules, (2) when the time between probes is spent in complete darkness, and (3) when food presentations are omitted at the end of 50% of intervals. The results strengthen and extend the conclusion from previous studies that the time relations themselves are the primary control of rate of responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.     

The effect of multiple SΔ periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: III. Effect of changes in pattern of interruptions, parameters and stimuli

Pigeons responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement were interrupted by S^Δ periods during the course of the intervals. Whether intervals were interrupted by 1, 2, or 5 S^Δ periods, the general scalloped pattern of FI responding persisted. Parameter values up to 27¾ hr for the FI and 2¾ hr for the individual S^Δ interruptions were studied. The results further weaken the hypothesis that the FI pattern of responding depends crucially on control of responding by continuously chained mediating behavior.     

Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: II. The scalloped pattern of the cumulative record

Responding under fixed-interval schedules usually generates either scalloped or break-and-run cumulative records. Earlier, it was generally accepted that the characteristic pattern was the scallop, but in recent years there has been an increasing emphasis on the break-and-run pattern. The break-and-run pattern has been shown quantitatively to provide a good fit of certain fixed-interval patterns. In the present work, responding during fixed-interval 1000-second components of a multiple fixed-interval 1000-second fixed-ratio 50 responses schedule was examined in two rhesus monkeys. Even after responding had started in an interval, there was a high tendency for responding to accelerate over subsequent 100-second segments of the interval. In segments with responding, the rate increased from one segment to the next in 303 of 389 segments in one monkey and in 310 of 419 segments in the other. The size of the increase was substantial, the rate in the fifth segment after responding started being an average of 4.5 times higher than the rate in the first segment after responding started. Hence, the usual pattern of responding in individual intervals was of sustained and substantial acceleration, vindicating numerically the conclusion derived from inspection of the scalloped patterns of the cumulative records.     

The effect of multiple SΔ periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule

The effect of repeated interruption of FI responding by short S^Δ presentations on the pattern of increasing frequency of responding through the interval has been studied. Although the S^Δ profoundly changed the pattern of responding during their presentation, the general scalloped pattern of FI responding survived. The implication of these findings for understanding the role of chaining of responses in FI patterns is discussed. It is suggested that chaining is not a necessary condition for the scalloped pattern.     

The effect of multiple SΔ periods on responding on fixed-interval schedule: II. in a primate

A squirrel monkey was subjected to a fixed-interval pattern of reinforcement. During the course of each interval a bright white light was repeatedly presented. In the presence of the white light, a response was never immediately followed by food; the white light thus functioned as S^Δ. Responding was interrupted during the S^Δ periods, but in the squirrel monkey as in the pigeon, these interruptions did not destroy the characteristic scalloped pattern of the cumulatively recorded responding through each interval.