The effectiveness of smoking cessation programs: Determinants and outcomes

Abstract

In this review, smoking cessation is discussed from a stress and coping perspective. Nicotine has been found to produce potentially reinforcing effects. Smoking cessation is best characterized as a process with various stages, of which the stage of relapse remains a major area for intervention research. Mood and expectancies appear to be major determinants of behavior in this stage. Social support apparently still needs conceptual refinement before it may be applied effectively in interventions. Effects of multicomponent treatment has been found to be increased when combined with nicotine replacement therapy. Notwithstanding the sometimes modest quit rates, smoking cessation has been found to be cost-effective among high-risk groups, both from an economical and health perspective. New research should focus on emotional and cognitive processes involved in cessation, in particularly self-efficacy expectations. While public policies may be most efficient in reducing the number of smokers in our society, an increasing number of smokers will be confronted with the addictive character of their smoking.     

Assessment of hostility in patients with coronary heart disease

One of the problems in efforts to more clearly conceptualize hostility is the amount of method variance, which ranges from self-report techniques to interview-based methods and mirrors the multidimensional nature of hostility and related constructs. In addition, rather few studies concerned with the assessment of hostility have specifically used samples of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to examine the multidimensionality of the construct of hostility in a sample of male coronary patients with some frequently used instruments. Factor analysis was used to detect the relevant underlying constructs, which were assessed using a variety of hostility measures in a sample of cardiac patients undergoing baseline assessment in an ongoing health-education intervention study. Measurement included both questionnaires and interviews. Participants (N = 235) were divided into 3 diagnostic groups: patients who had recently undergone (a) a myocardial infarction, (b) coronary artery bypass grafting, or (c) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A 4-factor solution appeared to provide the best fit, and the following factors were isolated: Anger-Out, Negative Affect, Coping, and Anger-In. All intercorrelations were less than .50. Medical diagnosis did not differ with regard to the 4 factors found. The total hostility construct as measured by the structured interview (SI) did not fit into the 4-factor model. This study was the first to show that dimensions of anger and hostility constitute valid and relevant aspects of the general construct of hostility for a representative group of CHD patients. The 4 aspects of hostility isolated using some well-known hostility questionnaires and the SI explained most of the observed variance. Although the SI appeared to tap more general state anger, the 4 aspects of hostility may be differentially related to health in those who are coronary prone. Future studies on the role of hostile or negative emotions in CHD patients should, therefore, pay greater attention to the multidimensional nature of hostility and may clearly benefit from the use of the 4-factor model described in this article.     

Timed performance weaknesses on computerized tasks in pediatric brain tumor survivors: A comparison with sibling controls

With more children surviving a brain tumor, insight into the late effects of the disease and treatment is of high importance. This study focused on profiling the neurocognitive functions that might be affected after treatment for a pediatric brain tumor, using a broad battery of computerized tests. Predictors that may influence neurocognitive functioning were also investigated. A total of 82 pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTSs) aged 8–18 years (M = 13.85, SD = 3.15, 49% males) with parent-reported neurocognitive complaints were compared to a control group of 43 siblings (age M = 14.27, SD = 2.44, 40% males) using linear mixed models. Neurocognitive performance was assessed using measures of attention, processing speed, memory, executive functioning, visuomotor integration (VMI), and intelligence. Tumor type, treatment, tumor location, hydrocephalus, gender, age at diagnosis, and time since diagnosis were entered into regression analyzes as predictors for neurocognitive functioning. The PBTSs showed slower processing speeds and lower intelligence (range effect sizes .71–.82, p < .001), as well as deficits in executive attention, short-term memory, executive functioning, and VMI (range effect sizes .40–.57, p < .05). Older age at assessment was associated with better neurocognitive functioning (B = .450, p < .001) and younger age at diagnosis was associated with lower intelligence (B = .328, p < .05). Medical risk factors, e.g., hydrocephalus, did not show an association with neurocognitive functioning. Late effects in PBTSs include a broad range of neurocognitive deficits. The results suggest that even PBTSs that were traditionally viewed as low risk for neurocognitive problems (e.g., surgery only, no hydrocephalus) may suffer from decreased neurocognitive functioning.     

Cognitive-affective assets and vulnerabilities: Two factors influencing adaptation to Fibromyalgia

The present article describes the associations between hostility and serum lipids in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients. A sample of 212 male coronary patients was used of which 127 recently suffered a Myocardial Infarction (MI), and 85 had undergone either a Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) or a Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA). Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and triglyceride concentrations were measured as well as four hostility factors: ‘Negative Affectivity’ (NA), ‘Anger-In’ (AI), ‘Anger-Out’ (AO) and Coping, i.e. behaviors to control feelings of anger and anxiety. The results indicated that the effects of hostility on lipids were mediated by various factors such as body weight in relation to body length (BMI), Socio-Economic Status (SES), Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Age. In subgroups of highly exhausted patients or of patients scoring high on the Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP), however, more direct (unilinear) associations between lipids and hostility were found. The findings of the present study confirm the rather weak association between hostility and blood lipids found elsewhere. Furthermore, a low level of triglycerides was consistently associated with low AO, be it again in interaction with BMI (AO × BMI), both in the group of non-MI patients and in the total sample for those patients who score high on vital exhaustion and/or TABP. This finding provides an extra argument against the popular notion of the healthfulness under all circumstances of anger expression. Until now the exact role of triglycerides as a function of anger/hostility has been under-explored. This issue merits further attention in future research.