FOCUS超声刀与电刀在甲状腺手术中的比较研究

探讨FOCUS超声刀在甲状腺手术中的应用价值。选取2012年12月～2013年12月在我院乳甲外科住院手术甲状腺病例180例作为研究对象,其中FOCUS超声刀组90例,电刀组90例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后伤口引流量、术中气管前及腺体周围线结数量、手术并发症发生率。结果超声刀组在甲状腺手术平均时间（58．4±7．7）min ,术中平均出血量（24．8±8．1）ml,术后伤口引流量（41．5±6．7）ml,气管前及腺体周围线结数量（1．8±1．2）个,与电刀组比较,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。术后并发症发生率超声刀组与电刀组均较低。FOCUS超声刀在甲状腺手术中比传统电刀具有明显优势,安全、有效且不增加并发症发生率,值得在临床工作中推广。     

Who are the Best‐Known National and Foreign Creators — a Comparative Study Among Undergraduates in China and Germany

Separate studies of Chinese and Western individuals have suggested that there are cultural differences in perceptions of creativity, particularly in an emphasis on meritorious salience versus aesthetic salience as bases for creativity, but cross‐cultural studies are needed to substantiate that difference. In this study, undergraduates from Giessen in Germany and Hong Kong and Nanjing in China provided data on the recognition of famous creative persons. Chinese undergraduates in Hong Kong and Nanjing mostly nominated politicians, scientists or inventors, but rarely nominated artists, musicians. German undergraduates mostly nominated philosophers, artists, and writers but rarely nominated politicians. This supports our assumption that the Chinese evaluation of creators emphasizes the meritorious salience of creativity whereas the German evaluation of creators emphasizes the aesthetic salience of creativity. Implications and limitations of this study are discussed at the end of the paper.