排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
Amihud Gilead 《Philosophia》2016,44(3):775-786
2.
Amihud Gilead 《Ratio》1999,12(3):257-270
I attempt to save akrasia from the skeptical doubt and denial as to its possibility in a new way. I argue that the akratic agent – the akrates – has unconscious reason(s) for the akratic action. Moreover, the akrates does not weigh and value the reasons for and against the akratic action in full awareness, including their emotive significance, consciously experienced as feelings. He follows his feelings favoring the akratic action (since he does not tolerate or resist them), and does not let his unconscious emotions, supporting the wanted, chosen action, play a causal role in impelling him to perform this action. 相似文献
3.
Philosophia - In spite of some panentheistic traits in his philosophy, Spinoza was clearly a pantheist. Spinoza’s God is not personal and not transcendent but immanent, as God is identical to... 相似文献
1