全文获取类型
收费全文 | 274篇 |
免费 | 13篇 |
国内免费 | 3篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 4篇 |
2022年 | 2篇 |
2021年 | 4篇 |
2020年 | 4篇 |
2019年 | 14篇 |
2018年 | 11篇 |
2017年 | 7篇 |
2016年 | 8篇 |
2015年 | 10篇 |
2014年 | 5篇 |
2013年 | 27篇 |
2012年 | 9篇 |
2011年 | 8篇 |
2010年 | 4篇 |
2009年 | 17篇 |
2008年 | 12篇 |
2007年 | 20篇 |
2006年 | 12篇 |
2005年 | 10篇 |
2004年 | 16篇 |
2003年 | 9篇 |
2002年 | 12篇 |
2001年 | 8篇 |
2000年 | 6篇 |
1999年 | 9篇 |
1998年 | 3篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 5篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 3篇 |
1993年 | 7篇 |
1992年 | 3篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1990年 | 6篇 |
1989年 | 3篇 |
1988年 | 4篇 |
1987年 | 3篇 |
1985年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有290条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
121.
Ian G. Barbour 《Zygon》1994,29(4):457-487
Abstract. I trace three paths from nature to religious interpretation. The first starts from religious experience in the context of nature; examples are drawn from nature poets, reflective scientists, and exponents of creation spirituality. The second,„Natural Theology”uses scientific findings concerning cosmology or evolution to develop an argument from design–or alternatively to defend evolutionary naturalism. The third,„Theology of Nature”starts from traditional religious beliefs about God and human nature and reformulates them in the light of current science. I point to examples of each of these paths in papers by other participants in this symposium, and suggest that all three paths can contribute to the task of relating science and religion today. 相似文献
122.
Cantors diagonal argument provides an indirect proof that there is no one-one function from the power set of a set A into A. This paper provides a somewhat more constructive proof of Cantors theorem, showing how, given a function f from the power set of A into A, one can explicitly define a counterexample to the thesis that f is one-one. 相似文献
123.
Erik C. W. Krabbe 《Argumentation》1992,6(2):271-283
This paper discusses several types of relevance criticism within dialogue. Relevance criticism is a way one could or should criticize one's partner's contribution in a conversation as being deficient in respect of conversational coherence. The first section tries to narrow down the scope of the subject to manageable proportions. Attention is given to the distinction between criticism of alleged fallacies within dialogue and such criticism as pertains to argumentative texts. Within dialogue one may distigguish tenability criticism, connection criticism, and narrow-type relevance criticism. Only the last of these three types of criticism constitutes a charge of fallacy and carries with it a burden of proof. In the second it is observed that a full study of narrow-type relevance criticism would require the construction of complicated, many-layered, dialogue systems. Such a study can, however, be profitably preceded by setting up profiles of dialogue that help us discuss the ins and outs of certain types of move. This is illustrated with an example. 相似文献
124.
Harvey Siegel 《Argumentation》1999,13(2):183-201
Central to argumentation theory is a concern with normativity. Argumentation theorists are concerned, among other things, with explaining why some arguments are good (or at least better than others) in the sense that a given argument provides reasons for embracing its conclusion which are such that a fair- minded appraisal of the argument yields the judgment that the conclusion ought to be accepted -- is worthy of acceptance -- by all who so appraise it.This conception of argument quality presupposes that the goodness of arguments is characterizable in terms of features of the argument itself. It makes no reference either to the attributes of the persons appraising the argument and judging its normative force, or to the context in which that appraisal is carried out. But recent work by a wide range of philosophers, argumentation theorists, and social theorists rejects such an abstract, impersonal notion of argument goodness. Instead, these theorists insist upon taking seriously, in the evaluation of arguments, the features of the evaluators themselves. In particular, such theorists emphasize the importance of cultural difference in argument appraisal. Often locating themselves under the banner of multiculturalism, they argue that the quality of an argument depends upon culturally-specific beliefs, values, and presuppositions; that an argument may be of high quality in one cultural context but of low quality in another. Consequently, they contend, no abstract, impersonal characterization of argument quality can succeed.In this paper I consider this multiculturalist approach to argument quality. I argue that while there is much merit in the general multiculturalist perspective, the multiculturalist argument against impersonal conceptions of argument quality fails. It fails for several reasons detailed below; most fundamentally, it fails because it itself presupposes just the kind of impersonal account of argument quality it seeks to reject. I call this presupposition that of transcultural normative reach. I identify this presupposition in the multiculturalist argument, and show how it undercuts the multiculturalist challenge to abstract, impersonal, transcultural conceptions of argument quality. I conclude with an evaluation of the strengths, and weaknesses, of the multiculturalist challenge to such conceptions of argument quality. 相似文献
125.
Gary Watson 《The Journal of Ethics》1999,3(4):353-368
In this paper I discuss two kinds of attempts to qualify incompatibilist and compatibilist conceptions of freedom to avoid what have been thought to be incredible commitments of these rival accounts. One attempt -- which I call soft libertarianism -- is represented by Robert Kane's work. It hopes to defend an incompatibilist conception of freedom without the apparently difficult metaphysical costs traditionally incurred by these views. On the other hand, in response to what I call the robot objection (that if compatibilism is true, human beings could be the products of design), some compatibilists are tempted to soften their position by placing restrictions on the origins of agency. I argue that both of these attempts are misguided. Hard libertarianism and hard compatibilism are the only theoretical options. 相似文献
126.
Sissela Bok 《Argumentation》1988,2(1):7-25
This article takes up the challenge that the motto Do What is Right Though the World Should Perish invites for an answer to Kant's arguments in defense of the motto. His argumentation is discussed, as well as the underlying assumptions concerning the role of Providence, the rejection of moral conflict, and the prudential risks associated with abandoning moral absolutism. The first two are rejected, the third seen as only partially tenable. Finally, the question is taken up what to do about moral prohibitions in a world in which they can quite literally prevent or bring about universal perishing. 相似文献
127.
Pluhar EB 《Theoretical medicine and bioethics》2006,27(4):333-355
In this article, I argue that it is wrong to conduct any experiment on a nonhuman which we would regard as immoral were it to be conducted on a human, because such experimentation violates the basic moral rights of sentient beings. After distinguishing the rights approach from the utilitarian approach, I delineate basic concepts. I then raise the classic “argument from marginal cases” against those who support experimentation on nonhumans but not on humans. After next replying to six important objections against that argument, I contend that moral agents are logically required to accord basic moral rights to every sentient being. I conclude by providing criteria for distinguishing ethical from unethical experimentation. 相似文献
128.
Although the genetic argument is a widely used interpretative argument, what it amounts to does not seem to be altogether
clear. Basic forms of the genetic argument that are distinguished are often too rough to provide an adequate basis for the
evaluation of an interpretative decision. In this article I attempt to provide a more detailed analysis of the genetic argument
by making use of pragma-dialectical insights. The analysis clarifies the character and the structure of different forms of
the genetic argument and thus the elements that are relevant for the evaluation of the argument.*
* An earlier version of this paper was presented at 21st IVR World Congress (Lund, 2003). 相似文献
129.
Pragma-dialectical approaches to legal argumentation seem to be rather different from traditional approaches appealing to
standards of propositional logic. Pragma-dialectical analysis of arguments by analogy and e contrario seem to fall foul to the rigors of logical analysis, in which problems or even concepts of analogy and e contrario seem to
disappear. The brunt of both types of special legal argumentation appears to be borne by often implicit general principles
and an appeal to the system of the law as a whole. Still, pragma-dialectics and logical analysis of legal argument are best
seen as fruitfully supplementing each other in ongoing research of ever evolving legal argument. 相似文献
130.
This article sets up a graph-theoretical framework for argumentation-analysis (dialectical analysis) which expands classical argument-analysis. Within this framework, a main theorem on the existence of inconsistencies in debates is stated and proved: the vicious circle theorem. Subsequently, two corollaries which generalize the main theorem are derived. Finally, a brief outlook is given on further expansions and possible applications of the developed framework. 相似文献