全文获取类型
收费全文 | 455篇 |
免费 | 43篇 |
国内免费 | 11篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 21篇 |
2022年 | 7篇 |
2021年 | 15篇 |
2020年 | 25篇 |
2019年 | 33篇 |
2018年 | 32篇 |
2017年 | 26篇 |
2016年 | 25篇 |
2015年 | 26篇 |
2014年 | 24篇 |
2013年 | 49篇 |
2012年 | 20篇 |
2011年 | 5篇 |
2010年 | 10篇 |
2009年 | 22篇 |
2008年 | 16篇 |
2007年 | 13篇 |
2006年 | 17篇 |
2005年 | 14篇 |
2004年 | 19篇 |
2003年 | 25篇 |
2002年 | 17篇 |
2001年 | 7篇 |
2000年 | 3篇 |
1999年 | 10篇 |
1998年 | 1篇 |
1997年 | 5篇 |
1996年 | 4篇 |
1995年 | 4篇 |
1993年 | 3篇 |
1992年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1990年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 2篇 |
1988年 | 3篇 |
1985年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有509条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
501.
502.
Guillermo Marín Penella 《Metaphilosophy》2023,54(4):480-492
This paper presents a program of action for the philosophy of regulatory science, based on a general theory of social epistemology. Two candidates are considered. The first one, offered by Alvin Goldman, is not fit for our purposes because it is focused on a veritism incompatible with non-epistemic aims of regulatory science. The second, championed by Steve Fuller, sociologically investigates the existing means of producing knowledge, to modify them with the goal of obtaining democratic aims through action on a legislative meta-level. The program has been built upon this procedure, instantiated by the identification, characterization, and modification of epistemic policies. 相似文献
503.
Participatory action research: towards (non-ideal) epistemic justice in a university in South Africa
ABSTRACTThe paper explores the possibilities for promoting epistemic justice in a South African university setting through a participatory action-based photovoice research project in which university researchers worked alongside undergraduate students with no prior experience of doing research. The student voices are employed to understand how learning as capability development and agency expansion can advance epistemic justice in a university setting of hierarchical relationships that make participatory action research challenging. The paper considers how, in this project, spaces of epistemic democracy intersected with the expansion of multidimensional functionings, resulting in more epistemic justice for the student-researchers. The paper considers the possibilities for change through a participatory project toward promoting epistemic justice at the individual level. It also explores some criticisms of the limits of such individual development in the face of structural challenges. 相似文献
504.
Preschool children were presented with slides on a computer screen showing a novel object, together with two informants, one with an attractive and one with a less attractive face. Children were asked which informant they would like to ask about the name of the novel object. After hearing the informants provide conflicting names, they were asked who they thought was correct. Children were more likely to endorse names provided by the person with the more attractive face, a bias that cannot be justified on epistemic grounds. The implications of this finding are discussed. 相似文献
505.
506.
507.
Jesse Couenhoven 《The Journal of religious ethics》2000,28(1):63-88
Christians have long understood grace both as a declaration of acceptance and as a power that transforms. This article illumines two theses while investigating the relationship between these understandings of grace in Luther, Calvin, and Barth's development of the law/gospel dialectic and the doctrines of justification and sanctification. First, though each theologian makes use of both understandings of grace, each also tends to emphasize one over the other. The unity and tension within and between these perspectives help to show that while both pictures are of the greatest importance for each other and cannot be separated, they also exist in tension, as long as they are worked out in the lives of sinners. Second, the author claims that the positions of Luther and Barth are more alike than is generally recognized. 相似文献
508.
Micah Lott 《The Journal of religious ethics》2002,30(3):315-339
Alasdair MacIntyre's account of tradition–based rationality has been the subject of much discussion, as well as the object of some recent charges of inconsistency. The author considers arguments by Jennifer Herdt, Peter Mehl, and John Haldane which attempt to show that MacIntyre's account of rationality is, in some way, inconsistent. It is argued that the various charges of inconsistency brought against MacIntyre by these critics can be understood as variations on two general types of criticism: (1) that MacIntyre's account of tradition–based rationality presents a picture of rationality with inconsistent internal elements, and (2) that MacIntyre, in the act of presenting his picture of rationality, makes the sort of claims to which his own account of rationality denies legitimacy, and thus MacIntyre's account is self–referentially incoherent. In response to criticisms of the first sort, it is argued that MacIntyre can further clarify or develop his position to take the current criticisms into account without altering the fundamental aspects of his picture of rationality. In response to the charge of self–referential incoherence, it is argued that the charge rests on a mistaken understanding of MacIntyre's position and of the nature of justification. In dealing with these arguments, the author hopes to not only vindicate MacIntyre's account of rationality against the charges of some of its recent critics, but also to shed some light on the nature of arguments both for and against relativism and historicism. 相似文献
509.
David Little 《The Journal of religious ethics》1999,27(1):151-177
In reviewing five edited collections and one monograph from the 1990s, the article summarizes the present status of the "human rights revolution" that was signaled by the adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights . It goes on to elaborate and evaluate some of the attempts contained in these books to deal with theoretical and practical controversies surrounding the subject of human rights, particularly the discussion of what to make of "cultural relativism" as far as human rights are concerned. Finally, the article summarizes some recent thinking and research on a neglected area, namely compliance with human rights standards protecting "freedom of religion or belief." 相似文献