咖啡因与心理紧张对血压的影响 --交叉文化的比较研究

研究表明，摄入咖啡因后，其中的甲基黄嘌呤会使血压持续增高，在国外咖啡因每年人均消耗量与致命的缺血性心脏病的发生率有极大的相关。本文探索不同文化背景的中国受试者在咖啡因和紧张的心理刺激作用下是否会有与习惯饮用咖啡的西方国家，如美、英、法等有相同的结果。本研究结果部分地支持了GREENBERG的实验结果，咖啡因会引起血压的持续升高，咖啡因跟紧张的思考活动结合一起会引起相当大的血压变化等。     

Combination or Differentiation? Two theories of processing order in classification

Does cognition begin with an undifferentiated stimulus whole, which can be divided into distinct attributes if time and cognitive resources allow (Differentiation Theory)? Or does it begin with the attributes, which are combined if time and cognitive resources allow (Combination Theory)? Across psychology, use of the terms analytic and non-analytic imply that Differentiation Theory is correct—if cognition begins with the attributes, then synthesis, rather than analysis, is the more appropriate chemical analogy. We re-examined four classic studies of the effects of time pressure, incidental training, and concurrent load on classification and category learning (Kemler Nelson, 1984; Smith & Kemler Nelson, 1984; Smith & Shapiro, 1989; Ward, 1983). These studies are typically interpreted as supporting Differentiation Theory over Combination Theory, while more recent work in classification (Milton et al., 2008, et seq.) supports the opposite conclusion. Across seven experiments, replication and re-analysis of the four classic studies revealed that they do not support Differentiation Theory over Combination Theory—two experiments support Combination Theory over Differentiation Theory, and the remainder are compatible with both accounts. We conclude that Combination Theory provides a parsimonious account of both classic and more recent work in this area. The presented data do not require Differentiation Theory, nor a Combination–Differentiation hybrid account.     

Subjective and physiological responses to the 35% carbon dioxide challenge in healthy and non-clinical control populations: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background/Rationale: The carbon dioxide (CO₂) challenge has been reliably used in laboratory settings as a panicogen in clinical populations. However, the magnitude of these effects on healthy and non-clinical control populations are not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to provide quantitative estimates of those effects. Specifically, the current paper will evaluate the relative efficacy of the CO₂ challenge in eliciting both subjective and physiological arousal in healthy and non-clinical control populations.

Method: A total of 16 articles with 35 independent samples were included in the meta-analysis, while 37 studies with 74 independent samples were included in the systematic review.

Results: Both the meta-analysis and systematic review found the CO₂ challenge to elicit an increase in subjective distress via self-reported anxiety and fear. Physiological responses via blood pressure and heart rate were heterogeneous in studies sampled, with no significant changes observed across studies. Moderator analyses revealed the variations in findings may be attributed to participant screening and invasive sampling.

Discussion: Findings highlight the CO₂ challenge as a useful tool in the provocation of subjective distress. Implications for both the use of the CO₂ challenge and its anticipated effects in healthy and non-clinical control populations are discussed.