Of Power and Compassion

Abstract: While military and economic power are obviously central instruments of policy in international relations, there are a number of reasons why power alone is insufficient to succeed in fighting terrorism. Three central reasons are discussed in this essay: the limitations and the dilemma of power; the proposition that the most threatening form of terrorism, such as al‐Qaeda's, is conducted by nonstate actors, conventional deterrence against whom is less effective; and the role of motivation in conflicts where the distribution of power is asymmetrical. In addition to these objective reasons, it is argued that the foreign‐policy strategies pursued ultimately affect the actors' own values.     

政府权能道德的理论探源

政府权能的道德基础和道德限度为西方无数思想家所关注 ,由此形成了流派各异的思想理论 ,主要有政府建立基于更大的善业的理性权能观、政府使命在于实现公平与正义的正义权能观、政府权力源于公民权利让渡的契约权能观和政府边界止于个人自由和权利的功利权能观。这些政府权能道德理论在今天仍有十分重要的启示意义。     

Application of the maximum-entropy method to data on short-term variability in inter-beat interval and an interpretation of the calculated powers

Sixteen young males underwent resting and mental arithmetic and were injected with 100 μg phenylephrine during the interventions. Half of them further underwent trinitroglycerine injections. Power spectral density for inter-beat interval variability was calculated using the maximum-entropy method (MEM) with a very high lag, and its validity was checked by nonlinear least-squares method. It was found that the MEM could produce a very accurate power spectral density. Results on the low- and high-frequency (LF and HF) powers indicated that the phenylephrine injection increased both the LF and HF powers, that the trinitroglycerine injection increased the LF power to some degree, and that the mental arithmetic decreased both the LF and HF powers with both phenylephrine and trinitroglycerine. Therefore, the LF power could be interpreted as a marker of both the vagal and sympathetic activities, whereas the HF power seemed to be solely associated with vagal activity. The implications of the interpretation are discussed in terms of the controversy on the LF power (vagal plus sympathetic vs. sympathetic).     

The Dependency–Counterdependency Dynamic: Interactive Effects of System Justification and Power-Distance Orientation on Radicalization against the Political System

System Justification Theory posits that individuals are less prone to engage in radical action against a system on which they depend. In the present research, we investigated how the association between system-justifying tendencies and radical intentions is moderated by individuals' orientation towards power differentials, namely their “power distance.” A stronger power distance orientation implies that individuals perceive power differentials as a fixed feature of society, curtailing prospects for change. We hypothesized that, at lower levels of power distance orientation, system-justification tendencies would be associated with reduced radical intentions. We contend this will occur because individuals feel dependent on a system perceived as malleable (dependency hypothesis). Conversely, at higher levels of power distance orientation, we expected system-justification tendencies to be associated with stronger radical intentions. We argue that this effect reflects the rejection of dependency on a system perceived as fixed (counterdependency hypothesis). This dependency-counterdependency dynamic was tested using a multigroup latent structural equation model and samples from four countries (N_Total = 2,502), South Korea, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results were consistent with the hypothesized dynamic across all countries. Theoretical implications of the findings, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.