全文获取类型
收费全文 | 2335篇 |
免费 | 224篇 |
国内免费 | 122篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 5篇 |
2023年 | 63篇 |
2022年 | 31篇 |
2021年 | 45篇 |
2020年 | 111篇 |
2019年 | 151篇 |
2018年 | 134篇 |
2017年 | 143篇 |
2016年 | 136篇 |
2015年 | 86篇 |
2014年 | 101篇 |
2013年 | 311篇 |
2012年 | 62篇 |
2011年 | 49篇 |
2010年 | 39篇 |
2009年 | 67篇 |
2008年 | 116篇 |
2007年 | 147篇 |
2006年 | 155篇 |
2005年 | 118篇 |
2004年 | 107篇 |
2003年 | 89篇 |
2002年 | 76篇 |
2001年 | 43篇 |
2000年 | 61篇 |
1999年 | 52篇 |
1998年 | 36篇 |
1997年 | 39篇 |
1996年 | 20篇 |
1995年 | 17篇 |
1994年 | 10篇 |
1993年 | 13篇 |
1992年 | 10篇 |
1991年 | 7篇 |
1990年 | 11篇 |
1989年 | 3篇 |
1988年 | 14篇 |
1987年 | 2篇 |
1980年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有2681条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
111.
Alex Sager 《Metaphilosophy》2014,45(3):422-440
Philip Kitcher presents an ambitious account of pragmatic naturalism that incorporates an explanatory story of the emergence and development of ethics, a metaethical perspective on progress, and a normative stance for moral theorizing. This article contends that Kitcher's normative stance is incompatible with the explanatory and metaethical components of his project. Instead, pragmatic naturalists should endorse a normative ethics that is experimental, grounded in practice, and acutely aware of cognitive and informational limitations. In particular, the ethical project would benefit from endorsing empirical work on participatory democracy for the identification of mechanisms to guide us on deep moral conflicts. 相似文献
112.
113.
114.
James A. Van Slyke 《Zygon》2014,49(3):696-707
Robert N. McCauley's new book Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (2011) presents a new paradigm for investigating the relationship between science and religion by exploring the cognitive foundations of religious belief and scientific knowledge. McCauley's contention is that many of the differences and disagreements regarding religion and science are the product of distinct features of human cognition that process these two domains of knowledge very differently. McCauley's thesis provides valuable insights into this relationship while not necessarily leading to a dismissive view of theology or religious belief. His paradigm allows the research lens to focus on cognitive differences in processing scientific versus religious information and the important role of automatic, unconscious, and intuitive cognitive processes in understanding both the natural and supernatural worlds. 相似文献
115.
Andrew Ali Aghapour 《Zygon》2014,49(3):708-715
Previous critics have argued that Robert McCauley defines religion and science selectively and arbitrarily, cutting them to fit his model in Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. McCauley has responded that final definitions are “overrated” and that artificial distinctions can serve an important role in naturalistic investigation. I agree with this position but argue that a genealogy of the category of religion is crucial to the methodology that McCauley describes. Since the inherent ambiguity of religion will undermine any essential claims about its cognitive naturalness, I invite McCauley to consider how his research might investigate scientific and religious cognition in new terms. 相似文献
116.
Robert N. McCauley 《Zygon》2014,49(3):728-740
Although I certainly have differences with some of my commentators, I am grateful for the time, effort, and attention that each has devoted to my book, Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. They have helpfully pointed out features of my positions that need clarification and elaboration. I am also grateful to the editor of Zygon, Willem Drees, for this opportunity to undertake that task here. 相似文献
117.
This article considers the imago Dei from the perspective of paleoanthropology. We identify structural, functional, and relational elements of the imago Dei that emerged mosaically during human evolution. Humans are unique in their ability to relate to each other and to God, and in their membership of cultural communities where shared attention, the transmission of moral norms, and symbolic behavior are important elements. We discuss similarities between our approach and the concept of theosis adopted in the Eastern Orthodox Church. 相似文献
118.
David Rousseau 《Zygon》2014,49(2):476-508
Within the scientific study of spirituality there are substantial ambiguities and uncertainties about relevant concepts, terms, evidences, methods, and relationships. Different disciplinary approaches reveal or emphasize different aspects of spirituality, such as outcomes, behaviors, skills, ambitions, and beliefs. I argue that these aspects interdepend in a way that constitutes a “systems model of spirituality.” This model enables a more holistic understanding of the nature of spirituality, and suggests a new definition that disambiguates spirituality from related concepts such as religion, cultural sophistication, and prosocial behavior in animals. It also exposes important open questions about the nature of spirituality. To support the emerging scientific approach to the study of spirituality, I propose the development of a “philosophy of spirituality” that can clarify the conceptual terrain, identify important research directions, and facilitate a comprehensive and interdisciplinary investigation into the nature, validity, and implications of spirituality's conceptual and practical entailments. 相似文献
119.
Steven Horst 《Zygon》2014,49(2):323-347
Since early modernity, it has often been assumed that miracles are incompatible with the existence of the natural laws utilized in the sciences. This paper argues that this assumption is largely an artifact of empiricist accounts of laws that should be rejected for reasons internal to philosophy of science, and that no such incompatibility arises on the most important alternative interpretations, which treat laws as expressions of forces, dispositions, or causal powers. 相似文献
120.
Aku Visala 《Zygon》2014,49(1):101-120
Most contemporary theologians have distanced themselves from views that identify the image of God with a capacity or a set of capacities that humans have. This article examines three arguments against the structural view and finds them wanting. The first argument is that the structural view entails mind/body dualism and dualism is no longer viable given neuroscience and contemporary philosophy. Against this, I argue that contemporary forms of dualism are able to circumvent such worries and are at least prima facie plausible. The second claim is that structural views end up disvaluing the human body and our relatedness. Here, I argue that neither the structural view nor dualism has such consequences. The third issue consists of various evolutionary worries that have to do with the lack of a clear‐cut boundary between human capacities and the capacities of nonhuman animals. As a response, the article argues that although there might not be a clear‐cut set of capacities that all humans share, we could still have a notion of human distinctiveness that is sufficient for the structural image of God. 相似文献