全文获取类型
收费全文 | 319篇 |
免费 | 24篇 |
国内免费 | 2篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 7篇 |
2022年 | 1篇 |
2021年 | 3篇 |
2020年 | 11篇 |
2019年 | 17篇 |
2018年 | 10篇 |
2017年 | 16篇 |
2016年 | 12篇 |
2015年 | 11篇 |
2014年 | 17篇 |
2013年 | 33篇 |
2012年 | 8篇 |
2011年 | 3篇 |
2010年 | 8篇 |
2009年 | 15篇 |
2008年 | 26篇 |
2007年 | 17篇 |
2006年 | 14篇 |
2005年 | 15篇 |
2004年 | 13篇 |
2003年 | 13篇 |
2002年 | 9篇 |
2001年 | 7篇 |
2000年 | 6篇 |
1999年 | 14篇 |
1998年 | 3篇 |
1997年 | 4篇 |
1996年 | 6篇 |
1995年 | 3篇 |
1994年 | 6篇 |
1993年 | 6篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 3篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1988年 | 5篇 |
1986年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有345条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
341.
朱子思想原本有着对于生活境域、对于“形而上”与“形而下”之间的活境的深刻感受。然而,朱子终不能抵挡思想史上常有的现成化倾向,最终造成思想与生活、形而上与形而下的割裂。王阳明思想的一个重大意义就是克服朱子思想中这种内在的不协调之处。 相似文献
342.
Christopher J. Insole 《The Journal of religious ethics》2008,36(3):447-489
Constitutional liberal practices are capable of being normatively grounded by a number of different metaphysical positions. Kant provides one such grounding, in terms of the autonomously derived moral law. I argue that the work of Edmund Burke provides a resource for an alternative construal of constitutional liberalism, compatible with, and illumined by, a broadly Thomistic natural law worldview. I contrast Burke's treatment of the relationship between truth and cognition, prudence and rights, with that of his contemporary, Kant. We find that in each case where Kant's system is constructed from the first principle of autonomy, Burke's thought is oriented toward an end that is not of our making. Readings of Burke as a natural law thinker are currently out of fashion among Burke commentators; without relying, for the main thesis, on historical claims about Burke's “Thomism,” I nonetheless explore and challenge some of the assumptions that underlie the current orthodoxy. 相似文献
343.
Michael R. Slater 《The Journal of religious ethics》2008,36(4):653-681
Pragmatism is often thought to be incompatible with realism, the view that there are knowable mind‐independent facts, objects, or properties. In this article, I show that there are, in fact, realist versions of pragmatism and argue that a realist pragmatism of the right sort can make important contributions to such fields as religious ethics and philosophy of religion. Using William James's pragmatism as my primary example, I show (1) that James defended realist and pluralist views in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and philosophy of religion, and (2) that these views not only cohere with his pragmatism but indeed are basic to it. After arguing that James's pragmatism provides a credible and useful approach to a number of basic philosophical and religious issues, I conclude by reflecting on some ways in which we can apply and potentially improve James's views in the study of religion. 相似文献
344.
Slavica Jakelić 《The Journal of religious ethics》2014,42(1):156-166
Christian Smith's What Is a Person? calls for a normative turn in sociology—the grounding of sociology in a theory of human nature. While offering a systematic account of a thick view of personhood—what it should look like, how it can be applied, and why it is needed—the book proposes a critical realist personalism as the best metatheoretical direction for sociology. The author of this essay agrees with the main questions and direction of Smith's project. However, by historicizing the origins and sociological implications of personalist moral theory, the author problematizes the personalism that is one of the foundations of Smith's project. She contrasts personalism with humanism, suggesting that the latter might possess both the normative robustness and comparative potential needed for contemporary sociological theory and practice. She ends her response to Smith's book by raising questions about the relationship between critical realist personalism and theoretical pluralism. 相似文献
345.
David Plunkett 《Inquiry (Oslo, Norway)》2020,63(5):509-534
ABSTRACT In Choosing Normative Concepts, Eklund considers a “variance thesis” about our most fundamental (and seemingly most “authoritative”) normative concepts. This thesis raises the threat of an alarming symmetry between different sets of normative concepts. If this symmetry holds, it would be incompatible with “ardent realism” about normativity. Eklund argues that the ardent realist should appeal to the idea of “referential normativity” in response to this challenge. I argue that, even if Eklund is right in his core arguments on this front, many other important challenges for ardent realism remain that also stem from the issues about possible variance in normative concepts that he considers. Following this, I introduce further issues about conceptual variance. These are issues that arise within the context of the framework that Eklund proposes the ardent realist use to confront the variance theses he considers. In particular, the issues concern what normative role as such is, as well as, relatedly, which roles associated with a concept (or predicate) get to count as part of its normative role. The upshot is that issues about conceptual variance in normative domains might be even more challenging for the ardent realist to deal with than Eklund argues. 相似文献